[Iotsi] Noise in Specifications hurts
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 23 February 2016 04:12 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B5A1A1AA7 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:12:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dqLjdaU857XF for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7711A1A83 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:12:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mfilter19-d.gandi.net (mfilter19-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.147]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7F4A80C2; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:12:19 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter19-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter19-d.gandi.net (mfilter19-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AssTMP4SwfDd; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:12:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.254.229
Received: from nar.local (p5DC7FEE5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.254.229]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0650EA80BF; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:12:09 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <56CBDC17.70905@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:12:07 +0100
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: iotsi@iab.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010603020309090701070506"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/21791lbfuX53AJ0z8QRx3NZb1P8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:25:51 -0800
Subject: [Iotsi] Noise in Specifications hurts
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:12:24 -0000
Attached please find a short contribution (essentially a single page plus an appendix) that discusses noise in interoperability specifications. Not an earth-shattering result, but maybe worth a look. Grüße, Carsten
- [Iotsi] Noise in Specifications hurts Carsten Bormann