[IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5103 (2899)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 01 August 2011 19:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEB711E8156 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ng-0l34vX1Hq for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1637711E813A for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 52C2A98C4F3; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: bht@cert.org, elisa.boschi@hitachi-eu.com, dromasca@avaya.com, rbonica@juniper.net, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110801194839.52C2A98C4F3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:48:39 -0700
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5103 (2899)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:48:32 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5103, "Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5103&eid=2899 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Section: 4 Original Text ------------- The location of the Observation Point(s) with respect to the middlebox can be communicated using Options with Observation Point as Scope and elements such as lineCardID or samplerID. Corrected Text -------------- The location of the Observation Point(s) with respect to the middlebox can be communicated using Options with Observation Point as Scope and elements such as lineCardId or selectorId. Notes ----- s/lineCardID/lineCardId/ s/samplerID/selectorId/ Per the definitions in RFC5102, RFC5477 and IANA's IPFIX registry. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5103 (draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Publication Date : January 2008 Author(s) : B. Trammell, E. Boschi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Flow Information Export Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5103 (2899) RFC Errata System