Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-00.txt

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 21 September 2011 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4681F0D0B for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.48
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.48 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ak55aP3OU9+N for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9141F0CF9 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8LMr3V4007458; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:53:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.55.88.40] (dhcp-10-55-88-40.cisco.com [10.55.88.40]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8LMqvgU029092; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:52:58 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E7A6AC9.9000604@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:52:57 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>
References: <20110920103441.5003.50588.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E786FD4.2010901@cisco.com> <4E7A2BA2.5000206@plixer.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E7A2BA2.5000206@plixer.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030202010000080306080202"
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:50:42 -0000

Andrew,

Many thanks for double checking.
Now corrected in my temp version.

Regards, Benoit.
>
> In new version (page 34)
> "Withdrawa Message(s) before reusing them."
> should be
> "Withdrawal Message(s) before reusing them."
>
> New version (A.4.3 page 58)
> changes
> (41) "exportedPacketCount" to "exportedMessageTotalCount"
> (42) "exportedFlowCount" to "exportedFlowRecordTotalCount"
>
> but then uses "exportedFlowRecordTotalCount" for both 41 and 42 in the 
> diagram of the options template.
>
>
>  ...       Enterprise Number      |0| exportedFlowRecordTotalCo.=41|
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |       Field Length = 2        |0|exportedFlowRecordTotalCo.=42|
>
> should read as follows
>
>  ...       Enterprise Number      |0|exportedMessageTotalCount=41 |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |       Field Length = 2        |0|exportedFlowRecordTotalCo.=42|
>
> -Andrew
>
> On 09/20/2011 06:49 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Here is a new draft, to advance RFC 5101 to the next stage of 
>> standardization on the standards track, as foreseen by the future 
>> charter.
>>
>> DONE:
>>       Errata ID: 1655 (technical)
>>       Errata ID: 2791 (technical)
>>       Errata ID: 2814 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 1818 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2792 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2888 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2889 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2890 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2891 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2892 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2903 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2761 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2762 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2763 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2764 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2852 (editorial)
>>       Errata ID: 2857 (editorial)
>>
>>       Section 8: "a new sampling rate" has been removed from the list of
>>    examples that requires a new Template.
>>
>>       If the measurement parameters change such that a new Template is
>>    required, the Template MUST be withdrawn (using a Template Withdraw
>>    Message and a new Template definition) or an unused Template ID MUST
>>     be used.  Examples of the measurement changes are: a new sampling
>>    rate, a new Flow expiration process, a new filtering definition, etc.
>>
>>       Updated the references
>>
>>       Updated the "Document overview" section.
>>
>>       Template and UDP: included the proposal at
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/current/msg06051.html
>>
>>
>> TO DO:
>>       "time first flow dropped" and "time last flow dropped" 
>> inconsistency. See the discussion on the list.
>>       Replace the RFC5102 by RFC5102bis, when the draft will be posted.
>>       Replace the RFC5815 by RFC5815bis, when the draft will be posted.
>>       NTP RFC 1305 is obsoleted by RFC5905. Check if the format is 
>> the similar before updating the reference.
>>       IDNA RFC 3490 is obsoleted by RFC5890 and RFC5891. Double-check
>>
>> Did I miss anything, which is within the boundary of what we can 
>> change for the next level of standardization?
>>
>> For your convenience, a diff between RFC5101 and this draft is included.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: 	New Version Notification for 
>> draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-00.txt
>> Date: 	Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:34:41 -0700
>> From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> To: 	bclaise@cisco.com
>> CC: 	bclaise@cisco.com
>>
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Benoit Claise and posted to the IETF repository.
>>
>> Filename:	 draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information
>> Creation date:	 2011-09-20
>> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 66
>>
>> Abstract:
>>     This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
>>     protocol that serves for transmitting IP Traffic Flow information
>>     over the network.  In order to transmit IP Traffic Flow information
>>     from an Exporting Process to an information Collecting Process, a
>>     common representation of flow data and a standard means of
>>     communicating them is required.  This document describes how the
>>     IPFIX Data and Template Records are carried over a number of
>>     transport protocols from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX
>>     Collecting Process.  This document obsoletes RFC 5101.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPFIX mailing list
>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix