[IPFIX] nits in draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-01
Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu> Tue, 21 February 2012 12:17 UTC
Return-Path: <Quittek@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0651321F8795 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z4n6DWGNPl9c for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDE121F876F for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C98280004C3; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:17:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WIrHM7DZZDq3; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:17:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B2971280004C2; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:17:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (ENCELADUS.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E11280004C3; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:17:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.41]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:17:28 +0100
From: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu>
To: Thomas Dietz <Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Atsushi Kobayashi <akoba@nttv6.net>, Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de>
Thread-Topic: nits in draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-01
Thread-Index: AQHM8JLEqVSCrlycUkiltxN156PmIw==
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:17:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CB6949E6.4037E%quittek@neclab.eu>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [10.1.2.219]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <432D4CCFB7FAD84CB6D89F859CA4045B@office.hd>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPFIX] nits in draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-01
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:17:55 -0000
Dear authors of draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-01,
I just sent out the write-up for your draft.
Thank you very much for creating and updating it.
In the write-up you will find one nit to be fixed in the next version that
you will probably post after AD review or IETF last call:
In Section 9 (security considerations) you use the term "NOT RECOMMENDED".
This term is not listed at the end of section 1 where you refer to RFC
2119 terminology. Please add it there:
'"RECOMMENDED"' -> '"RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED"'
Thanks,
Juergen
- [IPFIX] nits in draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-01 Juergen Quittek