Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 19 December 2011 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FE621F84C3 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:50:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3uam2YLJxFd for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:50:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2270621F851A for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:50:48 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBJ9oesw020428; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:50:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.60.67.89] (ams-bclaise-8918.cisco.com [10.60.67.89]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBJ9od7N019722; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:50:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EEF08EF.1040004@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:50:39 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
References: <4ECABFF3.6040206@auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <4ECABFF3.6040206@auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050406040409050504030503"
Cc: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:50:53 -0000

Dear all,

Apparently, this WGLC is finished.
That would be great if we could advance this draft.
As a reminder of the different references between the drafts:

draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10.txt  <http://www.rfc-editor.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10.txt>status is MISSREF on draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib

draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib-04.txt  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib/>  status is Waiting for AD Go-Ahead, because of the following normative reference

       [I-D.dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis]
                   Dietz, T., Kobayashi, A., Claise, B., and G. Muenz,
                   "Definitions of Managed Objects for IP Flow Information
                   Export", draft-dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00 (work in
                   progress), October 2011.

                Note: This reference is actually 
draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00

Conclusion: draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00 is the bottleneck to publish 
3 RFCs

Regards, Benoit.
>
> Hi all:
>
> As discussed at last week's meeting, the WG Last Call for this
> draft (updated version of the IPFIX MIB) starts now, and will
> end on Wednesday, 7 December.  If you have comments on this,
> please email them to the IPFIX list.
>
> Cheers, Nevil
>