Re: [IPFIX] New version of IPFIX configuration draft

[Kobayashi Atsushi <[e-mail]>]

Sorry for sending duplicate same messages. 
I tryed to send same message until it updates. It took about 30 minutes.

On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:30:32 +0900
Kobayashi Atsushi <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Gerhard, Benoit and all,
> 
> This draft is almost complete and great work.
> I think that such XML configuration enhances efficiency of the use of
> flexibility of IPFIX.
> 
> IMHO, I am afraid that the filtering method is different than current ACL
> implemented in several routers. Therefore, the IPFIX XML cfg might not
> be implemented, because of the gap between current ACL filter and IPFIX
> XML cfg, even if psamp mention "AND" operation only.  
> 
> I propose the following XML schema added the ACL elements to -03 draft.
> I am not familiar with YANG yet, sorry.
> 
> http://www3.plala.or.jp/akoba/ipfix-cfg-acl.txt
> http://www3.plala.or.jp/akoba/ipfix-cfg-acl.html
> 
> The following Complex/Simple type elements are added.
> - Complex Type: accessListMatch_type
> - Complex Type: sequenceList_type
> - SFrom [e-mail]  Sun Mar  9 00:51:59 2008
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
X-Original-To: [e-mail]
Delivered-To: [e-mail]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F143A6C40;
	Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=0.347, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451,
	HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id MfqjHBYi2uzf; Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C10B3A6BD0;
	Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: [e-mail]
Delivered-To: [e-mail]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6095C3A6B0C
	for <[e-mail]>; Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id a+05nE4Rdfyf for <[e-mail]>;
	Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nttv6.net (mail.nttv6.net [IPv6:2001:fa8::25])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A55E28C0F6
	for <[e-mail]>; Sun,  9 Mar 2008 00:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (mail.nttv6.net [192.16.178.5])
	by mail.nttv6.net (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m298mxcg064493;
	Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:49:00 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from [e-mail])
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:49:11 +0900
From: Kobayashi Atsushi <[e-mail]>
To: Kobayashi Atsushi <[e-mail]>
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
	<[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.30.02 [ja]
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0
	(mail.nttv6.net [192.16.178.5]);
	Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:49:06 +0900 (JST)
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] New version of IPFIX configuration draft
X-BeenThere: [e-mail]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>,
	<mailto:[e-mail]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:[e-mail]>
List-Help: <mailto:[e-mail]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>,
	<mailto:[e-mail]?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [e-mail]
Errors-To: [e-mail]


Sorry for sending duplicate same messages. 
I tryed to send same message until it updates. It took about 30 minutes.

On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:30:32 +0900
Kobayashi Atsushi <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Gerhard, Benoit and all,
> 
> This draft is almost complete and great work.
> I think that such XML configuration enhances efficiency of the use of
> flexibility of IPFIX.
> 
> IMHO, I am afraid that the filtering method is different than current ACL
> implemented in several routers. Therefore, the IPFIX XML cfg might not
> be implemented, because of the gap between current ACL filter and IPFIX
> XML cfg, even if psamp mention "AND" operation only.  
> 
> I propose the following XML schema added the ACL elements to -03 draft.
> I am not familiar with YANG yet, sorry.
> 
> http://www3.plala.or.jp/akoba/ipfix-cfg-acl.txt
> http://www3.plala.or.jp/akoba/ipfix-cfg-acl.html
> 
> The following Complex/Simple type elements are added.
> - Complex Type: accessListMatch_type
> - Complex Type: sequenceList_type
> - Simple Type: action_type 
> 
> In addition, it allows "selectionProcess_type" to include
> "AccessListMatch" element. 
> 
> What do you think about that? I think that it enhances flexibility as
> optional. 
> 
> Regards,
> Atsushi KOBAYASHI
> 
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:50:21 +0100
> Gerhard Muenz <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > A new revision of the IPFIX/PSAMP configuration data model has been
> > published:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-muenz-ipfix-configuration-04.txt
> > 
> > Apart from smaller changes in the model itself, the big change compared
> > to the previous version concerns the specification language: instead of
> > XML Schema, we now use YANG, a new language for modelling Netconf data
> > models. As a consequence, conformance to Netconf can be guaranteed.
> > 
> > We received a lot of valuable feedback and support from Martin Bjorklund
> > who is a Netconf expert and author of the YANG draft. We will try to get
> > some additional feedback from other Netconf experts as well.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Gerhard
> > 

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix


imple Type: action_type 
> 
> In addition, it allows "selectionProcess_type" to include
> "AccessListMatch" element. 
> 
> What do you think about that? I think that it enhances flexibility as
> optional. 
> 
> Regards,
> Atsushi KOBAYASHI
> 
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:50:21 +0100
> Gerhard Muenz <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > A new revision of the IPFIX/PSAMP configuration data model has been
> > published:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-muenz-ipfix-configuration-04.txt
> > 
> > Apart from smaller changes in the model itself, the big change compared
> > to the previous version concerns the specification language: instead of
> > XML Schema, we now use YANG, a new language for modelling Netconf data
> > models. As a consequence, conformance to Netconf can be guaranteed.
> > 
> > We received a lot of valuable feedback and support from Martin Bjorklund
> > who is a Netconf expert and author of the YANG draft. We will try to get
> > some additional feedback from other Netconf experts as well.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Gerhard
> > 

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix