[IPFIX] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5476 (2053)

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Sun, 28 February 2010 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEAB3A832E for <ipfix@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:22:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJlcdxyghf+M for <ipfix@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:22:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62A33A84BA for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:22:50 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,555,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="178320327"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2010 09:22:48 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,555,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="450513709"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.15]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2010 09:22:47 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:22:25 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F8CBD9@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5476 (2053)
Thread-Index: Acq2ciGIdojgiFkDRiCxVbb1sILQWgCDqUVA
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: [IPFIX] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5476 (2053)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:22:52 -0000

 
IPFIX WG,

Please provide your advice on the resolution of this Errata and the
following six errata (in total seven numbered 2053 to 2059, all
Editorial) submitted for RFC 5476. 

Regards,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 1:28 AM
To: bclaise@cisco.com; andrjohn@cisco.com; quittek@nw.neclab.eu;
Romascanu, Dan (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net; quittek@netlab.nec.de
Cc: paitken@cisco.com; psamp@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5476 (2053)


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5476, "Packet
Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5476&eid=2053

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>

Section: 6.5.1.

Original Text
-------------
Notes:



   * There are two Records here in the same Data Set.  Each record

     defines a different Selection Sequence.



   * If, for example, a different Selection Sequence is composed of

     three Selectors, then a different Options Template with three

     selectorId Information Elements (instead of two) must be used.

Corrected Text
--------------
Notes:



   * There are two Records here in the same Data Set.  Each record

     defines a different Selection Sequence.



   * If, for example, a different Selection Sequence is composed of

     three Selectors, then a different Options Template with three

     selectorId Information Elements (instead of two) must be used.



   * IPFIX Reduced Size Encoding [RFC5101] has been used for the

     selectorId fields.

Notes
-----
Addition of "Reduced Size Encoding" note per Errata ID 2052.

NB "fields" is plural in this example only.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
"Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the
status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5476 (draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications
Publication Date    : March 2009
Author(s)           : B. Claise, Ed., A. Johnson, J. Quittek
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Packet Sampling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG