Re: [ipfix] flow rules
Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de> Mon, 08 May 2006 11:58 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd4NM-0007lp-VW for ipfix-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 07:58:08 -0400
Received: from mil.doit.wisc.edu ([128.104.31.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd4NL-0003TY-OA for ipfix-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 07:58:08 -0400
Received: from majordomo by mil.doit.wisc.edu with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1Fd4IF-0003Hf-00 for ipfix-list@mil.doit.wisc.edu; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:52:51 -0500
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21]) by mil.doit.wisc.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1Fd4IE-0003Ha-00 for ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:52:50 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.96] (dhcp.pacifictokyo.jp [219.101.140.1]) by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596251BAC9E; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:46:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:54:34 +0200
From: Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
To: farzaneh fatemipoor <farfatemi@yahoo.com>, ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: [ipfix] flow rules
Message-ID: <5EB55467EDCE002F20AD6858@753F3B888A9969457862729D>
In-Reply-To: <20060503043724.76272.qmail@web32809.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20060503043724.76272.qmail@web32809.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Precedence: bulk
Sender: majordomo listserver <majordomo@mil.doit.wisc.edu>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Hi Farzaneh, --On 02.05.2006 21:37 Uhr -0700 farzaneh fatemipoor wrote: > > hello, > I want to know how to store the flow rules. > I mean the format of storage and update and rule matching. > does ipfix have a specification for this aspect? where should i find it? We do not have an agreed storage format. However, discussion on this issue has started. You might want to have a look at draft-trammell-ipfix-file-00.txt. Still, there is no consensus yet on whether or not we need a standardized IPFIX storage format. Thanks, Juergen -- Help mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "unsubscribe ipfix" in message body Archive http://ipfix.doit.wisc.edu/archive/
- [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-11.t… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- RE: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Paul Aitken
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Paul Aitken
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- [ipfix] flow rules farzaneh fatemipoor
- Re: [ipfix] flow rules Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-… Benoit Claise
- INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: draft-i… Juergen Quittek
- Re: INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: dra… kobayashi atsushi
- Re: INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: dra… Juergen Quittek
- Re[2]: INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: … kobayashi atsushi
- Re: INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: dra… Benoit Claise
- Re: INFO-AD#4, was Re: [ipfix] AD review for: dra… Benoit Claise