IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-00

Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Thu, 16 June 2011 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05821F8564; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EpES95fjD2va; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E623621F855F; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF92D9307; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:24 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LseovClGhrgh; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pb-10243.ethz.ch (pb-10243.ethz.ch [82.130.102.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01454D9302; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:23 +0200 (MEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <201105301525.p4UFPaPQ019646@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED2474CE-A0B8-4532-9177-FBE887406686@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <201105301525.p4UFPaPQ019646@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-00
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:44:12 -0000

Hi, Al, all,

the -01 revision of bmwg-ipflow-meth addresses all my concerns with the -00 revision. It is in my opinion ready for submission.

Best regards,

Brian

On May 30, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Al Morton wrote:

> BMWG,
> CC: IPFIX WG,
> 
> This message begins the second WG Last call on the draft:
> 
> IP Flow Information Accounting and Export Benchmarking Methodology
> draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-01.txt
> 
> A URL for this draft is:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-01
> 
> The Last Call will end on June 20, 2011.
> 
> We have discussed this draft in the working group for
> over two years and made many improvements.
> We have also benefited from review by folks from IPFIX WG.
> 
> I now ask everyone to consider items where they commented earlier,
> and make sure that the resolutions are satisfactory.
> 
> Please weigh-in on whether or not this Internet-Draft
> should be given to the Area Directors and IESG for consideration and
> publication as an Informational RFC.  Send your comments
> to this list and/or acmorton@att.com.
> 
> Al
> bmwg chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email