Re: [ipfix-as] applicability draft version 06

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 13 July 2005 10:10 UTC

Message-ID: <42D4E3BB.9010007@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:49:47 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tanja Zseby <zseby@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
CC: ipfix-as@net.doit.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: [ipfix-as] applicability draft version 06
References: <42C821F1.1080306@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <42C821F1.1080306@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: majordomo listserver <majordomo@mil.doit.wisc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tanja,

Thanks for the new draft.
Some minor editorial problems left.

1.An alignment issue.

        0                   1                   2                   3  
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
       |          Set ID = 256         |          Length = 32          |  
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
       |                          198.18.1.12                          | 
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
       |                          198.18.2.254                         |  
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
       |   101110 00   |                 987410                       |  
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  


2.  RTFM flows, however, are bidirectional, i.e. an RTFM meter 
    matches packets from B to A and A to B as separate parts of a 
    single flow, and maintains two sets of packet and byte counters, 
    one for each direction. IPFIX flow are unidirectional. Users 
    that require bidirectional flows have to match the two 
    directions in post-processing. 

IPFIX flow are unidirectional
-> 
IPFIX flows are unidirectional

I guess that no new draft is needed, as those minor editorial changes 
can be solved after the IESG review...

Regards, Benoit.

> Hi all,
>
> we just submitted a new version of the IPFIX applicability statement 
> (draft-ietf-ipfix-as-06.txt). The only changes are some editorial 
> changes from Benoit and Tal Givoly's comments on IP Accounting 
> /reliability where we mainly referenced in section 2.1.what was stated 
> in RFC3917.
>
> Regards
> Tanja
>


--
Help        mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body
Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say
"unsubscribe ipfix" in message body
Archive     http://ipfix.doit.wisc.edu/archive/

[ipfix-as] applicability draft version 06 Tanja Zseby
Re: [ipfix-as] applicability draft version 06 Benoit Claise