[IPFIX] revising IPFIX IES 281 and 282

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Fri, 14 September 2012 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8183A21F8532 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lg3yo1ocCFua for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D3D21F852C for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6119; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347650997; x=1348860597; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject; bh=UZCRfGoY11VmFwLPSZLXSyDZmWBSdPzDQUnd+gwafJs=; b=CM2I08Q6OqnrOdW9kF34K2tzlJiVKVsp9vnqrrSBm/R9M11tfdRN6ZQ0 1nrzAfgHvFMcMKX25kh2bezncbSq7WTmuKlBZgSLCpwuVkfsDzp+fLd5D MEGRfGwckQUybuqhEM383FihLFkr69z6cGpiSzYXirI64dR6Qz2LkTnfw A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFAP2EU1CQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABFi2awJIEHgjkBWA09FhgDAgECAUsNCAEBHodrC5oTgSigJJIHA5VhgRSETIhYgWmCZw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,424,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217";a="8048729"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2012 19:29:56 +0000
Received: from [10.55.89.228] (dhcp-10-55-89-228.cisco.com [10.55.89.228]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8EJTt3l022405 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:29:55 GMT
Message-ID: <505385B4.9010108@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:29:56 +0100
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090103070804080707030604"
Subject: [IPFIX] revising IPFIX IES 281 and 282
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:29:58 -0000

Dear experts,


I propose to request that IANA modify IEs 281 and 282 to remove "NAT64" 
from their descriptions, to make them generic post-NAT-IPv6-adddress 
fields per their names.
And also take the opportunity to update 
"draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12" to RFC6146.

ie, removing the text in *red* below, and adding the text in *green*.

Perhaps we should add some other NAT RFCs, or entirely remove the last 
sentence, "See ... for specification" ?

Support? Feedback? Objections?

Thanks,
P.


281    postNATSourceIPv6Address    ipv6Address    current

           The definition of this Information Element is identical to
           the definition of Information Element 'sourceIPv6Address', 
except that
           it reports a modified value caused by a *NAT64* middlebox 
function after
           the packet passed the Observation Point.

           See [RFC2460] for the definition of the Source Address field 
in the IPv6
           header. See [RFC3234] for the definition of middleboxes. See
*http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12* 
*RFC6146* for
           nat64 specification.


282    postNATDestinationIPv6Address    ipv6Address    current

           The definition of this Information Element is identical to
           the definition of Information Element 
'destinationIPv6Address', except
           that it reports a modified value caused by a *NAT64* 
middlebox function
           after the packet passed the Observation Point.

           See [RFC2460] for the definition of the Destination Address 
field in the
           IPv6 header. See [RFC3234] for the definition of middleboxes. See
*http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful-12* 
*RFC6146* for
           nat64 specification.