[IPFIX] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt)
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 19:11 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3F11E80D7 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs-wytjTW2rC for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2967211E80EA for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (host-64-47-153-50.masergy.com [64.47.153.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6GJBRVx067271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:27 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <51E59ADA.7090902@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:22 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/23.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipfix@ietf.org
References: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [IPFIX] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:29 -0000
Thanks guys, we made it. joel -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:18:13 -0700 From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: ipfix chair <ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, ipfix mailing list <ipfix@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt) as Internet Standard This document is the product of the IP Flow Information Export Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis/ Technical Summary Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract and/or introduction of the document. If not, this may be an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract or introduction. Working Group Summary The documents obsoletes RFC 5101. It does not change the technical content of the RFC5101 protocol specification, but it add several clarifications. The WG jointly worked on improving RFC5101 based on implementations experience and document reviews. There is strong consensus on the document. Document Quality This is an update of RFC 5101 based on a lot of practical experiences with implementing and operating the IPFIX protocol. Changes compared to RFC 5101 result from these experiences. Personnel Juergen Quittek is the document shepherd. He has reviewed it personally and believes that this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication.