[IPFIX] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3F11E80D7 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs-wytjTW2rC for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2967211E80EA for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (host-64-47-153-50.masergy.com [64.47.153.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6GJBRVx067271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:27 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <51E59ADA.7090902@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:22 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/23.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipfix@ietf.org
References: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130716181813.14154.38776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [IPFIX] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:11:29 -0000

Thanks guys,

we made it.

joel


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Protocol Action: 'Specification of the IP Flow Information 
eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information' to 
Internet Standard (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt)
Date: 	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:18:13 -0700
From: 	The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To: 	ietf@ietf.org
To: 	IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: 	ipfix chair <ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, ipfix mailing list 
<ipfix@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>



The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Specification of the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for
    the Exchange of Flow Information'
   (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10.txt) as Internet Standard

This document is the product of the IP Flow Information Export Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis/




Technical Summary

    Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract
    and/or introduction of the document.  If not, this may be
    an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract
    or introduction.

Working Group Summary

     The documents obsoletes RFC 5101.  It does not change the technical
     content of the RFC5101 protocol specification, but it add several
     clarifications.  The WG jointly worked on improving RFC5101 based
     on implementations experience and document reviews.  There is strong
     consensus on the document.


Document Quality

     This is an update of RFC 5101 based on a lot of practical experiences
     with implementing and operating the IPFIX protocol.  Changes compared
     to RFC 5101 result from these experiences.

Personnel

    Juergen Quittek is the document shepherd. He has reviewed it personally
     and believes that this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG
     for publication.