[IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 09 November 2011 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACDA21F8492 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:04:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3da345TCSTbC for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACDD21F85B1 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA9G3u5M022841; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:03:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.60.67.88] (ams-bclaise-8917.cisco.com [10.60.67.88]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA9G3uLk004718; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:03:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EBAA46C.4010309@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:03:56 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000205030403080101090700"
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:04:05 -0000
Hi Nevil, Juergen, From the agenda at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/ipfix.txt, there is one item missing in the "Current work items": Configuration Data Model for IPFIX and PSAMP, draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10 This item is important as, if we look at the dependencies: draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10, in the RFC-editor, has got a MISSREF: draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib. However, the latest draft-ietf-ipfix-psamp-mib version has a normative reference to draft-dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00. So assuming that we agree on draft-dkcm-ipfix-rfc5815bis-00, which introduces an IANA only change, I would like to propose that we start the WGLC directly after the meeting, deblocking this way draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10 Regards, Benoit.
- [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-10 Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-… Juergen Quittek