Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10 [editorial error]

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sun, 15 September 2013 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E36411E8117 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DBON-L2423V6 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B1F21E8087 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1331; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1379259403; x=1380469003; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OPNMGfBM7G11sdtjqIijlArVO2ROj4QKW456TZIW+H0=; b=fW9vFXUA5YhPGI8TCqynJ13tfor8xRC9ViiSHAQy7siS3poRBCnzk15E GMleEksUTrR3tVrz1wo3ApDc6M3lBu8smKRSam1sN/2CMDYYyK/Tg9z0F U3VBQFIQKZXpiN4sd9Z0B7n6+/E+/MEXVDrGlTE45JNAG54sGwyoELyT5 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFALrSNVKQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABbgwc4wTyBFxZ0giYBAQQBAQE1NgoBEAshFg8JAwIBAgEVMAYNAQUCAQGHfwy5eI9zB4QeA5d7gS+FAYtEgyY6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,909,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="86676371"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2013 15:36:39 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8FFabJc005077; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 15:36:37 GMT
Message-ID: <5235D405.3050407@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:36:37 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>
References: <523327A7.6040106@plixer.com>
In-Reply-To: <523327A7.6040106@plixer.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10 [editorial error]
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 15:36:59 -0000

Thanks Andrew,

Corrected part of the AUTH48 process.

Regards, Benoit
> I just noticed the following in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10
>
>     [RFC5101]      Claise, B., Ed., "Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP
>                    Flow Information Export (IPFIX)", RFC 5103, January
>                    2008.
>
>     [RFC5103]      Trammell, B., and E. Boschi, "Specification of the IP
>                    Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the
>                    Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information", RFC 5101,
>                    January 2008.
>
> should be
>
>     [RFC5103]      Claise, B., Ed., "Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP
>                    Flow Information Export (IPFIX)", RFC 5103, January
>                    2008.
>
>     [RFC5101]      Trammell, B., and E. Boschi, "Specification of the IP
>                    Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the
>                    Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information", RFC 5101,
>                    January 2008.
>
> It appears to have been wrong since bis-00 so we all skipped over it
> multiple times.
>
> -Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
> .
>