[ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IPFIX traceroute records
"STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN" <emile.stephan@francetelecom.com> Wed, 23 March 2005 17:47 UTC
Received: from mil.doit.wisc.edu (mil.doit.wisc.edu [128.104.31.31]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11754 for <ipfix-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:47:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by mil.doit.wisc.edu with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1DE9hO-00065d-00 for ipfix-list@mil.doit.wisc.edu; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:31:18 -0600
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([195.101.245.15]) by mil.doit.wisc.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1DE9hN-00065Q-00 for ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:31:17 -0600
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.152]) by parsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:30:20 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IPFIX traceroute records
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:30:19 +0100
Message-ID: <DD8B8FEBBFAF9E488F63FF0F1A69EDD1F4F982@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IPFIX traceroute records
Thread-Index: AcUpT+A+wm9JYVbYT+SM5xVhfYQY/gGeTYTA
From: STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN <emile.stephan@francetelecom.com>
To: Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
Cc: ippm@ietf.org, ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2005 17:30:20.0026 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC7515A0:01C52FCD]
Precedence: bulk
Sender: majordomo listserver <majordomo@mil.doit.wisc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Juergen, My thinking is that we might use IPFIX to export the traceroute results. What about using 2 templates: one for the measure and another one for results? 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | FlowSet ID = 0 | Length = xx bytes | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 256 | Field Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | FlowID (e.g. measure ID) | Field Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-| | sourceIPv4Address | Field Length = 4 | Src +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | destinationIPv4Address | Field Length = 4 | Dst +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | FlowSet ID = 0 | Length = xx bytes | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 257 | Field Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | FlowID (e.g. measure ID) | Field Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SampleID | Field Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Src UDP | flowStartMicroSeconds | Field Length = 8 | pkts time +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | flowEndDeltaUSeconds | Field Length = 4 | Troute RTT +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | destinationIPv4Address | Field Length = 4 | Hop Addr +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ This is compact and is very close to what describes Guido draft (draft-pohl-perpktinfo-02.txt). We need only to define a new Field Type named 'SampleID' (named PacketID in Guido document). Regards Emile -----Message d'origine----- De : ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Juergen Quittek Envoyé : mardi 15 mars 2005 12:09 À : ippm@ietf.org Objet : Re: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? The I-D is still missing a data model, because there is no consensus yet on the mailing list about whether to use an XML-based data model or a more compact one. Please find some pro and con arguments at http://people.internet2.edu/~matt/IPPM/Meetings/ietf62/ippm-2005-03-07-traceroute.pdf Thanks, Juergen --On 15.03.2005 11:15 +0100 Juergen Quittek wrote: > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, there was no discussion on traceroute storage during > our last meeting. Therefore I bring this issue to the mailing list. > > There is an I-D describing an information model for traceroute records: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-niccolini-ippm-storetraceroutes-00.txt > > This work was initiated by the development of a database for traffic > measurement tools and traces, see http://www.ist-mome.org/database/ > > Currently, there is no standard way of exchanging traceroute > measurements except for the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module (RFC2925). > But this can only be used for transferring measurement data from an > SNMP agent to its manager(s). It is not useful for exchange between > traffic measurement tools. > > A standardized record format for traceroute measurements would be > very useful for building tools, databases and other applications > that handle traceroute measurements and need to exchange them. > > Therefore I propose that this becomes an IPPM WG work item. > Any comment, pro or con, is very welcome. > > Thanks, > > Juergen > -- > Juergen Quittek quittek@netlab.nec.de Tel: +49 6221 90511-15 > NEC Europe Ltd., Network Laboratories Fax: +49 6221 90511-55 > Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany http://www.netlab.nec.de > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm -- Help mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "unsubscribe ipfix" in message body Archive http://ipfix.doit.wisc.edu/archive/
- [ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IP… STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN
- [ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IP… Juergen Quittek
- [ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item? IP… STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: [ipfix] RE: [ippm] traceroute as WG work item… Benoit Claise