Re: [IPFIX] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5477 (2052)
Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de> Mon, 01 March 2010 08:49 UTC
Return-Path: <muenz@net.in.tum.de>
X-Original-To: ipfix@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3077128C275 for <ipfix@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 00:49:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNslT07T33lr for <ipfix@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 00:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47883A7930 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 00:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.152] (ppp-93-104-74-113.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.74.113]) by mail.net.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8718E2243A81; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:49:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B8B7F85.8010205@net.in.tum.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:49:09 +0100
From: Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F8CBE4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F8CBE4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms040408060408050504000304"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5477 (2052)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:49:03 -0000
Hi all, If we accept errata 2052 [1], we do not need erratas 2053 to 2059 [2] because the examples do not show any reduced size encoding. [1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5477&eid=2052 [2] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5476 Regards, Gerhard Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > This one is Technical! > > WG members, please suggest a resolution. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Aitken [mailto:paitken@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 1:31 AM > To: RFC Errata System > Cc: Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu; bclaise@cisco.com; > dressler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de; carle@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de; > Romascanu, Dan (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net; quittek@netlab.nec.de; > psamp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5477 (2052) > > Errata errata, sigh. > > See inline... > > > RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5477, >> "Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5477&eid=2052 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> >> >> Section: 8.1.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> Abstract Data Type: unsigned16 >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> Abstract Data Type: unsigned32 > > "unsigned64". > > P. > >> Notes >> ----- >> Change selectorID from 16 bits to 64 bits per discussion on the IPFIX > mailing list: >> >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/current/msg05133.html >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. >> When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to >> change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5477 (draft-ietf-psamp-info-11) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports >> Publication Date : March 2009 >> Author(s) : T. Dietz, B. Claise, P. Aitken, F. Dressler, G. > Carle >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Packet Sampling >> Area : Operations and Management >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG > > > -- > Paul Aitken > Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix -- Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard Münz Chair for Network Architectures and Services (I8) Technische Universität München - Department of Informatics Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany Phone: +49 89 289-18008 Fax: +49 89 289-18033 E-mail: muenz@net.in.tum.de WWW: http://www.net.in.tum.de/~muenz
- [IPFIX] FW: [Errata Verified] RFC5477 (2052) Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [IPFIX] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5477 (… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [IPFIX] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC54… Gerhard Muenz
- Re: [IPFIX] [Sender: ipfix-bounces@ietf.org] Re: … Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] [Sender: ipfix-bounces@ietf.org] Re: … Gerhard Muenz
- Re: [IPFIX] [Sender: ipfix-bounces@ietf.org] Re: … Paul Aitken