[ipfix] FW: Informational RFC to be: draft-claise-netflow-9-08.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Fri, 28 May 2004 15:39 UTC
Received: from mil.doit.wisc.edu (mil.doit.wisc.edu [128.104.31.31]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10830 for <ipfix-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2004 11:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by mil.doit.wisc.edu with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1BTjD0-0005yu-00 for ipfix-list@mil.doit.wisc.edu; Fri, 28 May 2004 10:23:46 -0500
Received: from auemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.223.163] helo=auemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by mil.doit.wisc.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1BTjCy-0005ym-00 for ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu; Fri, 28 May 2004 10:23:45 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by auemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i4SFNfi07765 for <ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu>; Fri, 28 May 2004 10:23:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <JB9TZBB5>; Fri, 28 May 2004 17:23:40 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504679079@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "'Ipfix Wg' (E-mail) (E-mail)" <ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu>
Subject: [ipfix] FW: Informational RFC to be: draft-claise-netflow-9-08.txt
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 17:23:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk
Sender: majordomo listserver <majordomo@mil.doit.wisc.edu>
FYI Thanks, Bert -----Original Message----- From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] Sent: vrijdag 28 mei 2004 16:09 To: RFC Editor Cc: iana@iana.org; The IESG Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-claise-netflow-9-08.txt The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Cisco Systems NetFlow Service Export Version 9' <draft-claise-netflow-9-08.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG contact person is Bert Wijnen. Thank you, The IESG Secretary Technical Summary Describes Netflow Version 9 and served also as input for the IPFIX protocol evaluations effort. Working Group Summary This is an individual submission via RFC-Editor. It is intended to document the Netflow Version that was submitted to IPFIX WG for evaluation. At the same time it serves as a public documentation for NetFlow version 9. The IPFIX WG has evaluated this document and has no issue with publication as an informational RFC. Protocol Quality The document is an individual submision via RFC-Editor. Bert Wijnen has assured that: - it is not an end-run around IPFIX WG - IPFIX WG is OK with publication - it does not conflict with other IETF work RFC-Editor note Pls insert this IESG note on the front page: This RFC documents the Netflow protocol as it was when submitted to the IETF as a basis for further work in the IPFIX WG. This RFC itself is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard. The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any purpose, and in particular notes that it has not had complete IETF review for such things as security, congestion control or inappropriate interaction with deployed protocols. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion. Readers of this document should exercise caution in evaluating its value for implementation and deployment. The IETF is working on a standardized protocol in the IPFIX (IP Flow Information eXport) Working Group. -- Help mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "unsubscribe ipfix" in message body Archive http://ipfix.doit.wisc.edu/archive/
- [ipfix] FW: Informational RFC to be: draft-claise… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)