[IPFIX] WG Status, basically

Wayne Tackabury <wtackabury@us.ibm.com> Thu, 28 August 2014 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wtackabury@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8917E1A0035 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fIumckZdeifR for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8578E1A00D8 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from /spool/local by e7.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <ipfix@ietf.org> from <wtackabury@us.ibm.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:52 -0400
Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.167) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.107) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:50 -0400
Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81B6E8040 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s7SMInID2621874 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:18:49 GMT
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s7SMInmD008319 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:49 -0400
Received: from d01ml263.pok.ibm.com (d01ml263.pok.ibm.com [9.63.8.130]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s7SMInVZ008316 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:49 -0400
X-KeepSent: 352B6DAA:7EF39A08-85257D42:00799799; type=4; name=$KeepSent
To: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013
Message-ID: <OF352B6DAA.7EF39A08-ON85257D42.00799799-85257D42.007A9204@us.ibm.com>
From: Wayne Tackabury <wtackabury@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:18:49 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML263/01/M/IBM(Release 9.0.1FP1|April 03, 2014) at 08/28/2014 18:18:49
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=0ABBF7D1DFEA11098f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF7D1DFEA1109"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 14082822-5806-0000-0000-000000547DAF
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/rWpoJWbUHngu2m39NoncX_JD0Y0
Subject: [IPFIX] WG Status, basically
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:18:55 -0000


Hi all....somewhat recent WG document rat, first time poster to the list.

My sense, based on readings from a Vancouver "is it time to wrap up" agenda
item, and mailling list archives and particularly an exchange right around
the time of London, is that the WG is in that oft-gray state between
"winding down all current work items" and "closed out, somebody give us a
ring if there's a compelling reason for recharter" (at least, I've seen
that oft-gray-ness before).

The Ops area report still lists us as active, and I can see there's still
maybe 3-4 I'D's under discussion.  Then again, looks like the London WG
meetings were cancelled and nothing was scheduled for Toronto.   Of course,
that can mean that the work is being entirely satisfied on the list.  Is
there a concise statement of status anyone can offer up?

How about this for a quick way to ask a (maybe different) question -- do
folks anticipate active meetings in Honolulu in November?

Thanks!

Regards,
Wayne Tackabury
IBM Security Software Group