[IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4909)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 January 2017 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D731296E7 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkpHSUALKQ3e for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC72F1296E4 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9D5C4B81A09; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
To: muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, paitken@cisco.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170116221511.9D5C4B81A09@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/xwW5QO05obXY2oAbHBxoCeDwo1c>
Cc: vican.pavol@gmail.com, ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4909)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:15:13 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4909 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Pavol Vican <vican.pavol@gmail.com> Section: 6 Original Text ------------- pattern "\S+" ... pattern "\S(.*\S)?" Corrected Text -------------- pattern '\S+' ... pattern '\S(.*\S)?' or pattern "\S+" ... pattern "\S(.*\S)?" Notes ----- RFC 7950 in section 6.3.1 says that backslash has special meaning if it is in the double-quoted string. The only characters immediately following the backslash are n, t, \, ". Other characters are forbidden. This can be solved using single-quoted string or double backslash. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Flow Information Export Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4909) RFC Errata System