[IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4909)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 January 2017 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D731296E7 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkpHSUALKQ3e for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC72F1296E4 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9D5C4B81A09; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
To: muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, paitken@cisco.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170116221511.9D5C4B81A09@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/xwW5QO05obXY2oAbHBxoCeDwo1c>
Cc: vican.pavol@gmail.com, ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4909)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:15:13 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728,
"Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Pavol Vican <vican.pavol@gmail.com>

Section: 6

Original Text
pattern "\S+"
pattern "\S(.*\S)?"

Corrected Text
pattern '\S+'
pattern '\S(.*\S)?'


pattern "\S+"
pattern "\S(.*\S)?"

RFC 7950 in section 6.3.1 says that backslash has special meaning if it is in the double-quoted string. The only characters immediately following the backslash are n, t, \, ". Other characters are forbidden. This can be solved using single-quoted string or double backslash.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11)
Title               : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols
Publication Date    : October 2012
Author(s)           : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Flow Information Export
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG