Re: [IPP] Protocol Action: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics to Internet Standard

Thanks for the update, Mike! Given this status change for RFC 8011 (and corresponding change for RFC 8010), when do we expect them to complete the move to Internet Standard?

Smith

/**
    Smith Kennedy
    Wireless & Standards Architect - IPG-PPS
    Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB-IF
    Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
    HP Inc.
*/

On Jun 25, 2018, at 5:23 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com<mailto:msweet@apple.com>> wrote:

*Internet Standard*

Begin forwarded message:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>>
Subject: Protocol Action: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics to Internet Standard
Date: June 25, 2018 at 5:15:02 PM EDT
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org<mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>>, draft-sweet-rfc2911bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-sweet-rfc2911bis@ietf.org>, draft-sweet-rfc2910bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-sweet-rfc2910bis@ietf.org>, barryleiba@computer.org<mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: msweet@apple.com<mailto:msweet@apple.com>, blueroofmusic@gmail.com<mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics
 (rfc8011) to Internet Standard

This protocol action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-ipp-to-internet-standard/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8011/

Status Change Details:

As specified in RFC 6410:

  (1) There are at least two independent interoperating implementations
      with widespread deployment and successful operational experience.

      - Over 98% of all digital network printers shipped in the last
      decade support IPP/1.1 (originally defined in RFC 2910/2911,
      September 2000).

  (2) There are no errata against the specification that would cause a
      new implementation to fail to interoperate with deployed ones.

      - There are currently no errata against RFC 8010/8011.

  (3) There are no unused features in the specification that greatly
      increase implementation complexity.

      - There are no unused features in RFC 8010/8011.

      - The Purge-Jobs operation (from RFC 2911) is DEPRECATED in
      RFC 8011 (page 73) with "SHOULD NOT support" because it
      destroys Printer accounting implementation.  This operation
      has never been widely implemented in digital network printers.

      - The Restart-Job operation (from RFC 2911) is DEPRECATED in
      RFC 8011 (page 89) with "SHOULD NOT support" because it
      destroys Printer accounting implementation.  This operation
      has never been widely implemented in digital network printers.

  (4) If the technology required to implement the specification
      requires patented or otherwise controlled technology, then the
      set of implementations must demonstrate at least two independent,
      separate and successful uses of the licensing process.

      - There is no patented or otherwise controlled technology that
      is required to implement IPP/1.1 per RFC 8010/8011.

Personnel

  Alexey Melnikov is the responsible Area Director.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org<mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp