Re: [IPP] Updated draft of Job Accounting best practice posted

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 30 January 2020 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B27912007C for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 04:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lh1QxHaHKmli for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 04:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176A81200DF for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 04:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E323F3F47; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:42:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170564C1D; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E0AC832E9; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:42:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7793832E9 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:42:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mbp16.lan (unknown [67.204.236.184]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBF9A80858; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:42:48 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
In-Reply-To: <6E2140CD-D478-4407-B5D4-EDAC76548DE2@xerox.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:42:47 -0500
Message-Id: <574B5E02-1B38-480A-A05C-ABF964EE1E33@msweet.org>
References: <8F194DE8-2007-4C85-8256-594E666D9416@msweet.org> <6E2140CD-D478-4407-B5D4-EDAC76548DE2@xerox.com>
To: "Rizzo, Christopher" <Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Updated draft of Job Accounting best practice posted
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Chris,

I think I can say with certainty that the current Job Account best practice document is expected to grow significantly and continue to accumulate more details, history, etc.  The current draft reflects the comments from the last IPP WG review and *not* of anything you've posted since then - I'm just trying to get updated drafts out before the F2F and we will discuss your posts probably a bit today to decide on topics to focus on and then at the F2F session where we can hammer things out.

So please don't be discouraged from contributing - standards development doesn't always proceed in a straight line and often takes longer than anyone believes possible... :)


> On Jan 29, 2020, at 4:36 PM, Rizzo, Christopher <Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> I guess the email I sent yesterday with the attached Excel Spreadsheet may have been a bit of overkill, given the succinctness of this IPP Accounting spec (referring to section 4.3).   d:o)
>  
> Not sure my email had much influence then...  Also not sure where to go from here or if more input is requested of me.  I do think it's fair that one could say section 4.3 (which I agree is very well written) mainly covers what was in the spreadsheet I sent.
>  
> IPP Accounting spec does not mention legacy client issues you asked about however?  Is that as planned or overlooked?
>  
> Thanks,
> Chris
>  
> Christopher Rizzo
> Xerox Corporation
> GDG/Discovery/Advance Technology
> 26600 SW Parkway Ave.
> Wilsonville, OR 97070-9251
> Phone: (585) 314-6936
> Email: Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com
>  
> "The realization came over me with full force that a good part of the remainder of my life was going to be spent in finding errors in my own programs."
> -Maurice Wilkes, Memoirs of a Computer Pioneer
>  
> From: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org> on behalf of PWG Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
> Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
> Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 12:49 PM
> To: PWG Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
> Subject: [IPP] Updated draft of Job Accounting best practice posted
>  
> All,
>  
> I have posted an updated interim draft of the Job Accounting with IPP v1.0 best practice document to:
>  
>                 https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129.docx
>                 https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129.pdf
>                 https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129-rev.pdf
>  
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp