Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (6085)
Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Mon, 18 May 2020 15:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6293A07B9 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6MFKpIokV7M for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E933A07A9 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2365C3A8E; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:34:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DBA3A80; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2EC003A8E; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0503F5 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id p5so2524008vke.1 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tg3bSxTmut4PiPRUnNiqcPi/J8x1yrcMGkfv4/vw0WI=; b=mFN9GAH8Ad+CnPYcDDsLD7P8rmj5cLlh8Z0Qr4IsuNnDtldohgBT09y/fJqN5DxTcu NgkISeE95CydwOF/sdenc9kH62lhqeZFWpdJ4ndonkDzRRoXqhO3OFwiQk6+nZ+qlT7f avdTyRRK9RhHjN9RfkFJ8vnb6PB4U6A0H3fqFbhcUVKpdxicxyE2JxmS4imhLjbWpDZ9 2XaiXXMV5KJctnJKpw0xDbQlRVDHu8+lLqqmxVRYV9X5rfEpQmH9e7dgIYPBPoeA1if+ GTX4kcuietCTYEkE7BpDAa7ULqMjIwRb5Xt8ntARC1u2inDQeHfN8q+E5JPmzuKzavWM LFWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tg3bSxTmut4PiPRUnNiqcPi/J8x1yrcMGkfv4/vw0WI=; b=fNKhujh1wv8uu4UiDREH0WZGukHpw2QDm6kSgTRyka107zmxSjNKoDSPEiYYhe5Do+ Nw9twKKlSF11Y99Y/ykQuV4qaEwhcImsvwEbWCYlLvaKQVQBq/AUsYIdUINDPPQXqINi /zquMKd9GNJQkNHDsmVYsW/mTEslvNDBiJQ6fanFc2vfznn2TJBKAHlWYWW3oHx/exbE e+tnmtPSqIBCI/AkS3Z6Vz7o+ECIRMcf6RYHiuOQhVUi7BtRaa27BBX4GSsx1TvI51Pg rw1tFgDMWgtshDaKLgatqUxE94WvHTEEdK+gfLeoCAhhzGKKWCgU8AWpJhvIyUYNNsyW Q6NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IbKKQHgFZ0nkQ278HH5+Sj2lXPdQC0VcGnCgn/LX+9t3VUQNj i22N4wkcgRj/acfmuPY8cb+S2OxM4xwe3kVjicg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwP6Z2p5j4OAf94rknfINvWRg0ottB7ujUIAE4effwfJbbHjtPTAplC881t+V6/A9qwXjvxzEtRTYD1gCm6GWE=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2a0e:: with SMTP id q14mr11403365vkq.67.1589816040015; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200410175917.E03B3F406F6@rfc-editor.org> <CAN40gStU1p8bKTWs2Z2Xf6Qk=PDrUdrcgQq7AOhAbzLkzRKT+Q@mail.gmail.com> <044C0043-95E6-40CD-8286-F84988344335@msweet.org> <6459AA57-C37A-4093-98AC-17B58776D219@msweet.org> <D7F03FBD-217C-4CED-8E97-0778A893DE41@msweet.org> <CAN40gSuD7dEp8Q4Kke4Qbik+h2Qwaz1aJ_7YkhyYr23mARDSdw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gSuD7dEp8Q4Kke4Qbik+h2Qwaz1aJ_7YkhyYr23mARDSdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:33:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSs5XK18EbMmOTQCQL4sxTFY93HNazpCD7mRy0FO+HU_pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (6085)
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7749185036550685946=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
Hi Mike, I think we still have an open action to send a consensus errata text to the RFC Editor? Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music / High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com (permanent) PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:21 AM Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > And of course "lowercase" (one word) and not "lower case" > > Cheers, > - Ira > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) > Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG > Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG > Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group > Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG > IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc > http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic > http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc > mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com > (permanent) PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:54 AM Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> Yes, of course. I guess I should proofread my minutes better... :) >> >> >> > On Apr 24, 2020, at 12:10 AM, wamwagner@comcast.net wrote: >> > >> > I suggest that “…The first character SHOULD be a lower letter…” read >> “The first character SHOULD be a lower case letter” >> > Thanks., >> > Bill W. >> > >> > From: Michael Sweet via ipp >> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 7:39 PM >> > To: Michael Sweet >> > Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup >> > Subject: Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (6085) >> > >> > Follow-up from today's IPP WG conference call - the consensus is to >> change section 5.1.4 to read: >> > >> > The 'keyword' attribute syntax is a sequence of characters, of length 1 >> to 255, containing only the US-ASCII [RFC20] encoded values for uppercase >> letters ("A"-"Z"), lowercase letters ("a"-"z"), digits ("0"-"9"), hyphen >> ("-"), dot ("."), and underscore ("_"). The first character SHOULD be a >> lower letter, and all letters SHOULD be lowercase. >> > >> > Status should change to "confirmed", and we (at some point) will want >> to do an update (sigh). >> > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 10, 2020, at 8:31 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote: >> > >> > Ira, >> > >> > Looks like my attempts to get my contact email changed haven't >> completely been successful, either... :/ Comments below... >> > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 10, 2020, at 2:07 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Mike, >> > >> > We need to look into this errata on RFC 8011. >> > ... >> > -------------------------------------- >> > Type: Technical >> > Reported by: Thomas Urban <thomas.urban@cepharum.de> >> > >> > Section: 5.1.4 >> > >> > Original Text >> > ------------- >> > The 'keyword' attribute syntax is a sequence of characters, of length >> > 1 to 255, containing only the US-ASCII [RFC20] encoded values for >> > lowercase letters ("a"-"z"), digits ("0"-"9"), hyphen ("-"), dot >> > ("."), and underscore ("_"). The first character MUST be a lowercase >> > letter. >> > >> > Corrected Text >> > -------------- >> > The 'keyword' attribute syntax is a sequence of characters, of length >> > 1 to 255, containing only the US-ASCII [RFC20] encoded values for >> > uppercase letters ("A"-"Z"), lowercase letters ("a"-"z"), digits >> > ("0"-"9"), hyphen ("-"), dot ("."), and underscore ("_"). >> > >> > I think we need to be careful about changing this, but AFAIK this >> change shouldn't cause a problem (CUPS will accept this, at least...) >> > >> > >> > Notes >> > ----- >> > First, the "keyword" syntax is applicable to values of enumerations >> according to section 5.1.5 stating >> > >> > Each value has an associated 'keyword' name. >> > >> > However, section 5.4.15 is declaring some enum-type attribute with >> names per integer value using uppercase letters in violation of 5.1.4. >> Those names are commonly used all over the specification and thus it is >> rather common to assume those values are meant to be keyword-compliant >> names of given enumeration. >> > >> > First, these are operation names, and second the keyword associated >> with an enum is informative and not transmitted over the wire... >> > >> > >> > Second, section 5.1.4 is stating >> > >> > The first character MUST be a lowercase letter. >> > >> > referring to "a"-"z" according to enumeration of accepted characters >> given right before that. In opposition to that statement 5.4.14 is declaring >> > >> > The following standard 'keyword' values are defined in this document: >> > >> > * '1.0' [..] >> > * '1.1' [..] >> > >> > Neither of the two "keywords" start with a lowercase letter. >> > >> > True. >> > >> > ________________________ >> > Michael Sweet >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ipp mailing list >> > ipp@pwg.org >> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp >> > >> > >> > ________________________ >> > Michael Sweet >> > >> >> ________________________ >> Michael Sweet >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ipp mailing list >> ipp@pwg.org >> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp >> >
_______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- [IPP] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (6… Ira McDonald via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… wamwagner--- via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Ira McDonald via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Ira McDonald via ipp
- Re: [IPP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8011 (60… Michael Sweet via ipp