[IPP] Fwd: IPP 5100.9 issue on "printer-alert" and "printer-alert-table"

Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 13 August 2020 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD3D3A1078 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55ZuqAKBEZxQ for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA8F3A1066 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6E603E841; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C57E3E98; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:20:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 23BA64233; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:20:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3652642 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:20:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id v20so1977715ual.4 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ivKrl/lAkyljcqkYm0BjsXWiW05PSgZKTszo+RUua0o=; b=soz+e8ygF8pRGc3v79T5sQhHOsfsPEec1a3/vgxGkMJpB6Eo8jezWJMMV4WFa7qLJr 3aITky3crTaDqSg3pAmgRB8kDliPENTBjLlPGfsbPGHNhhcaCOLdvTQHskkDbIj5BPyc A86pcpCDn4BQJGgO1Uot75LBnAU3smfTTaVAlz4hVIAbfu6LYEobLcRTyA+puf+WQxKv 7llrkW1mxCnPNM6x3WFcpxyh0VGxYCMUsJ36IQ+88UMHTNhkut2dXnMZHK7BRBXjFMfx ZzoBmX/xWKoKGWLM9YmHlLR30r6GttA7xS0QcHDsgfQyGQjn05pOWVZlGzzTEaqQB1vi Xhyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ivKrl/lAkyljcqkYm0BjsXWiW05PSgZKTszo+RUua0o=; b=KiY94Og+Sm78r/U8BwlkutKfXfEjesyMyCDhkehpNjorzbMiezC/ySJoqK8ZCis340 D2p4g5tDjd2Z3NiabBUYDhYNR7B9kyFkd+eZ2GBNDEifFVI0zQLlqnk5cV0Vt2M1jSEc V6GEQfiZ1kkXMnXa8H110NdjqWi9SrePfUwyPxTsVJ1UxOW+caa6wIBp/vsZGagXa04R xonreukp7bb58DfU8cVkaOFuJ6nwm71th6dWwIcL+ToMaD67nG9KuNnysudRjZu7URKu GjCM7pk/MU18UlnEzlNU4SS0kpfUDkegghQPDapycE6uDI9/oaya3E7lovIrcR/bTFJ/ +XXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LRsRzgcfYtSK+S0FTBcuUUu1szUgqFqRIR2LWox5tVMasaqhJ Dbm7/8UT/tt3kN/toYsPd0RZeJjQF212990Ry0T6Og==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRYuGEHw4iuX2CHbYzQdmoHa2wPChMFyL7CVBYOyDDvn7p4zL3xBtpcN4FOtyw03+OK7dzODWVkDR07shFxXg=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2541:: with SMTP id 59mr4953906uaz.10.1597346452852; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <431DDD04-655F-4685-9172-F4232164784B@xerox.com> <2FC3BB79-0F29-41BD-9F58-E6A26845C883@msweet.org>
In-Reply-To: <2FC3BB79-0F29-41BD-9F58-E6A26845C883@msweet.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:20:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSs46u9XPPAPLMm4FHF9vk_Kos1vt2dU+jsiYv5zUQYWBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ipp@pwg.org" <ipp@pwg.org>, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, "Rizzo, Christopher" <Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com>
Subject: [IPP] Fwd: IPP 5100.9 issue on "printer-alert" and "printer-alert-table"
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0571673977828787246=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Date: Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [IPP] IPP Everywhere ipp-tests.sh printer-alert
To: Rizzo, Christopher <Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com>
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>


To close the loop on this, during today's IPP conference call we decided to
file an errata on 5100.9 to note that "printer-alert" and
"printer-alert-description" SHOULD NOT be reported when the prtAlertTable
is empty.

I have also included this in the latest IPP Everywhere v1.1 draft along
with a note concerning existing implementations that choose to report '' or
'code=other' for an empty table.  IPP Everywhere 1.1 also now makes this
attribute RECOMMENDED for physical printers and OPTIONAL for print servers.

The IPP Everywhere self-certification tools will also be updated to a) not
require printer-alert or printer-alert-description and b) allow
printer-alert to be the empty string.


> On Mar 21, 2020, at 11:37 PM, Rizzo, Christopher <
Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com> wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> I get a failure for printer-alert when running ipp-tests.sh because there
are no alerts present in the printer and IPP printer-alert attribute is
blank.  Is it not supposed to be blank?  I can't find in specs an explicit
statement of what the value of printer-alert should be when there are no
alerts present.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> Christopher Rizzo
> Xerox Corporation
> GDG/Discovery/Advance Technology
> 26600 SW Parkway Ave.
> Wilsonville, OR 97070-9251
> Phone: (585) 314-6936
> Email: Christopher.Rizzo@xerox.com
>
> "The realization came over me with full force that a good part of the
remainder of my life was going to be spent in finding errors in my own
programs."
> -Maurice Wilkes, Memoirs of a Computer Pioneer

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp