IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Label and Receipt Printing Extensions v1.1 posted

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Mon, 01 June 2026 12:38 UTC

Received: by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) id E4100F8A41F3; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1153F8A41F2 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1780317519; bh=jtHXcSoa+cLfptJdcA5ukE8AAnElAXm2yNZ5JhEARlc=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc; b=J2bj6qyQPLSHc0q83ICqX+qxYsJBKGXVoBLLhSMfSGTL1OM7cM+KcmlyW5E7aeZKl 4UA9p6c7EWLYLuLpnJrwgw92PJS0AjZhPIMwOPEFjIImSQ0pIK1UXfCblI/og8jGr9 dqcXKOefb3g8bjrFnhjbE2+t0q2GErvmlK+aH9s8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="f9uzjlWb"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="SkTwLaui"; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b="I0lOa0Q3"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Petu4UYdtbYU for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [172.104.19.21]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD17F8A41E9 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E1A45E902; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:38:38 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org E1A45E902
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1780317518; bh=jtHXcSoa+cLfptJdcA5ukE8AAnElAXm2yNZ5JhEARlc=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=f9uzjlWbVEHN+ryU3YkiodzVZH9Y2OWqTYcT0g9qkya/52NGPLLSbmNfNJwQEYKk2 p3MVo2BkNC6XSiJnd65Di5EMJm5mHhU4yBOFO3o2WkyXHTzVmBJ8et5v9ebvXPy+bv FtfLKKXAA+DkCfJzkilsWZgC/d/8aizeOlQ1eazw=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E346827B0; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:38:36 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org E346827B0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1780317516; bh=jtHXcSoa+cLfptJdcA5ukE8AAnElAXm2yNZ5JhEARlc=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=SkTwLauiASDimBl8tt8scr4Tj3Xqkqq+0B6kA75vyajr13ysyxoduY9B+Izm7Y8yp qpO8HBLPaH+Sx891ccWx+h7HJh/Qc2QrCFVILepJ6JSYeYT3Z2JivU+c3mG5qzVVTq aFi5qRjdJ0aQEpoJYmQ5OTSTgJFjeMWoJwf6gETc=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 458398823; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:38:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 458398823
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="I0lOa0Q3"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3480326F0 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 3480326F0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A7658081E; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org 0A7658081E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1780317513; bh=W6rmfH7fZ9tB1inCm5C/aIj9ZMvPB5TnwwxBLhNhmKI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=I0lOa0Q3nw4uB3s3BHfWwIckAzNxGoAgvat6bMPUcuEozIsvD23h40aacvjcFVehV FacTpi1a4t7KflTaYliXMKwePCXn2m3Gk670sQvTWnfdUXg9FiC71jGmD1WqzwWZdm PS3rzL0oPBRjyaUjXbE8GeM5m/GffE+KJmqs0BUI=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-a7b95f27-c79c-494e-afd1-d2de59703d19-1780306585991@trinity-msg-rest-gmx-gmx-live-c46dd5756-5lhmh>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:38:21 -0400
Message-Id: <66B7BF99-D424-42B3-A182-DA15352DCC45@msweet.org>
References: <trinity-a7b95f27-c79c-494e-afd1-d2de59703d19-1780306585991@trinity-msg-rest-gmx-gmx-live-c46dd5756-5lhmh>
To: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (23F77)
Subject: Re: [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Label and Receipt Printing Extensions v1.1 posted
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, ipp@pwg.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0145968158723297099=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Holger,

The list of vendor PDLs in this registration isn’t meant to be exhaustive. There isn’t a registered a MIME media type and I’ve not seen ad-hoc usage of a vendor type, but I’m happy to add it if you have one…

____________________
Michael Sweet

> On Jun 1, 2026, at 5:36 AM, Holger Gräfe via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> I'm wondering why section 9.1 (document-format) does not list the Honeywell/Datamax printer language (DPL). This is also very common for label printing.
>  
> Best regards,
> Holger Gräfe
>  
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 31. Mai 2026 um 20:15
> Von: "Michael Sweet via ipp" <ipp@pwg.org>
> An: "PWG IPP Workgroup" <ipp@pwg.org>
> CC: "Michael Sweet" <msweet@msweet.org>
> Betreff: [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Label and Receipt Printing Extensions v1.1 posted
> All,
> 
> I have posted an updated interim draft of the IPP Label and Receipt Printing Extensions v1.1 registration to:
> 
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipplabel11-20260531.docx
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipplabel11-20260531.pdf
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipplabel11-20260531-rev.pdf
> 
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status