[IPP] Guidelines for Writing RFC Security Considerations - draft revision

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Thu, 25 August 2016 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F09B12D0BB for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-xAEs5yKFoV for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.pwg.org (www.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7983F12B068 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by www.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1F7B24406; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by www.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25F83D66; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by www.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 102A7415D; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) by www.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E4635C1 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f6so90383301ith.0 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OndjQcgHOZU4ZP2vrPazlcZJSr00Qfjbua/hjK6r1pk=; b=Lmztx64EW48dN5gkYGb17ZXEd4o/66r+goPk8Ycn0Ivz74JVrLjuOCLeoyvyNdvZZG bWOuz20AryaOqe3wuZTXyeCQSySXE+2aBlUoXGKIW8FpwHHrob/nnvqtPX4PwPV+/AiN Kg0rygb6zqp8szfWVNFY9oNLWHpSqBfX3Ers7HQACR3YppxgPn0NQqbW/+FNVZCYcDIu Rm3DFUhRVe9FbYsTQILp4JzwKwvw2jUU/7OUfv8BXrW46bpcOzbi16YPaBnklpT9xVgU m45GdL5fQNt1ncOg6hBbYzzXWupisro3hmJyAig9FyGkqMzGlRO7TrlLVm11sv+nClar WYzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OndjQcgHOZU4ZP2vrPazlcZJSr00Qfjbua/hjK6r1pk=; b=PuSjP6AEBYxWsDWJI+2wvHwujhzdIPfoT8tzjgojrIB3c28eOGLYcPh1+bTBb0Rlzm qq3d3FHVn9X4i76B0pqqbs7sWZeoZgl1N/o/UYCg7XFI3CX3dplUs2cwGw3ruJNXMQIY 5y3MJIdtYl9Ixk197gDQk9n790d5sXzSyTEsgwRgCjQtSvXm75eRnqO6noe9alFUr2ia GZdQKr9+X153mKKXaS+UI1mXIQgTGOFVwoP+/19OWsNqH20xqVjbvQjuY/cu490QrpKd PSywH1FrbAyohYQcFP5gra+MhxzqVKDn/iVJ7pzH7BrdUe+O2n6290R6C+bLwZRCCIeR 6ZFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu+jNFEJBikqtVvICAWWCsm6p1VEy04CHovRt+d4C1o2Im1w+D9m0uswfNP4y7Pz/Hs6DyOtTC3+zX9gQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.6.21 with SMTP id 21mr10314390iog.142.1472132770090; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.11.67 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:45:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSush+VnUwBKS8YJLrDiMFWWAuafc99tNH8thMyiC=pkuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ipp@pwg.org" <ipp@pwg.org>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Subject: [IPP] Guidelines for Writing RFC Security Considerations - draft revision
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Printing Protocol Workgroup discussion list <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2573290373573853029=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

FYI - important reading material for all editors

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:24 AM
Subject: [saag] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis-00.txt
To: Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>


Hi.

As discussed at the SAAG meeting in Berlin, this is version -00 of the the
revision of RFC 3552 (“Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security
Considerations”).

This version is mostly RFC 3552 with minor changes:

   - Updated references where the original referenced RFCs have been
   obsoleted
   - Added missing references
   - Moved several references from Normative to Informative.
   - Minor nit fixes
   - New authors; old authors acknowledged in section 7.


Now we can start talking about changes that need to be made.

The XML is maintained in GitHub: https://github.com/IETF-SAAG/RFC3552bis

Feel free to suggest changes using PRs or emails to this list. Please email
this list with a link even if you submit a PR, because discussions happen
on list, not on GitHub.

Regards

Yoav

Begin forwarded message:

*From: *internet-drafts@ietf.org
*Subject: **New Version Notification for draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis-00.txt*
*Date: *25 August 2016 at 4:15:12 PM GMT+3
*To: *"Yoav Nir" <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "Magnus Westerlund" <
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yoav Nir and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis
Revision: 00
Title: Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations
Document date: 2016-08-25
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 44
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nir-
saag-rfc3552bis-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-saag-rfc3552bis-00


Abstract:
  All RFCs are required to have a Security Considerations section.
  Historically, such sections have been relatively weak.  This document
  provides guidelines to RFC authors on how to write a good Security
  Considerations section.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________
saag mailing list
saag@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp