Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History
Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Fri, 21 June 2019 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD34120136 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxCoxfHtA6fa for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA611200F5 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 3ACC91290C; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:44:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53548290D; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:44:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2400F24D5; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA8824D5 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:44:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from retina15x.lan (67-204-236-184.eastlink.ca [67.204.236.184]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA59780861; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20190621215351.96C5F3C82@mail.pwg.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:44:45 -0400
Message-Id: <C90BA644-85FD-4025-BEBD-4338E9FF9F7B@msweet.org>
References: <20190621215351.96C5F3C82@mail.pwg.org>
To: William A Wagner <wamwagner@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
Bill, > On Jun 21, 2019, at 5:53 PM, wamwagner--- via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote: > > Looking through the IPP Published Work list on the PWG website, I noticed that 5100.4 and 5100.10 are not listed. 5100.4 (Override Attributes for Documents and Pages) is well marked as obsolete on the FTP site. 5100.10 (Internet Printing Protocol Version 2.0) is not. > > • 5100.6 (Page Overrides) apparently obsoletes 5100.4 . It is not immediately clear whether Document Overrides are still supported. The 5100.4 docx and pdf files all say obsolete. Perhaps we can add a placeholder that points to the new one (that is already reflected in the internal document database, but we don't show it on the current site). > • The relationship between 5100.10 and 5100.12 (IPP Version 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2) does not appear to be spelled out. One would expect that .12 supersedes .10 . Is this correct? If so, should this not be indicated somewhere? Yes, when we added IPP/2.2 we bumped the spec number; we probably should have just reused the old number, but oh well. I can probably post an updated copy of 5100.10 that points to 5100.12, plus add a placeholder on the documents page with the same pointer. ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- [IPP] Questions on Specification History wamwagner--- via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Ira McDonald via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Ira McDonald via ipp