RE: Next Step
Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com> Mon, 02 February 1998 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: rpereira@TimeStep.com
Received: from beasley.cisco.com (mailgate-sj-2.cisco.com [171.69.2.135]) by ftp-eng.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id JAA27362 for <ippcp-archive-file@ftp-eng.cisco.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:48:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxy2.cisco.com (proxy2.cisco.com [192.31.7.89]) by beasley.cisco.com (8.8.4-Cisco.1/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with ESMTP id JAA04507 for <ippcp@external.cisco.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by proxy2.cisco.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id JAA09251 for <ippcp@external.cisco.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns.newbridge.com(192.75.23.67) by proxy2.cisco.com via smap (V2.0) id xma009226; Mon, 2 Feb 98 17:46:20 GMT
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) id MAA11873 for <ippcp@external.cisco.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 12:42:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kanata-gw1(192.75.23.72) by ns via smap (V1.3) id sma011564; Mon Feb 2 12:39:45 1998
Received: from kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com by kanata-gw1.ca.newbridge.com via smtpd (for ns.newbridge.com [192.75.23.67]) with SMTP; 2 Feb 1998 17:39:44 UT
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ca.newbridge.com. (8.8.6/8.8.6) id MAA02448 for <ippcp@external.cisco.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 12:39:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tsntsrv2.timestep.com(192.168.219.191) by kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com via smap (V1.3) id smaa02352; Mon Feb 2 12:39:21 1998
Received: by tsntsrv2.timestep.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52) id <01BD2FDA.ACCA5880@tsntsrv2.timestep.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 13:01:28 -0500
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-980202180126Z-1115@tsntsrv2.timestep.com>
From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
To: 'Naganand Doraswamy' <naganand@baynetworks.com>, "'ippcp@external.cisco.com'" <ippcp@external.cisco.com>
Subject: RE: Next Step
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 13:01:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In regards to the March 2nd IPSec bakeoff, I would like a show of hands of those organizations planning of testing IPComp. It would also be nice to have a IPComp survey of implementations much like the IPSec survey. Naganand, would you like to put together such a survey? >-----Original Message----- >From: Naganand Doraswamy [SMTP:naganand@BayNetworks.COM] >Sent: Monday, February 02, 1998 12:05 PM >To: ippcp@external.cisco.com >Subject: Next Step > >We are pretty close to getting the architecture draft through IESG. As we >discussed earlier, all the algorithm documents should become informational >RFC. I would like these forwarded to the IESG before the LA IETF. Right now >we have two drafts- > >1. draft-ietf-ippcp-lzs-02.txt >2. draft-ietf-ippcp-deflate-01.txt > >Are there any other comments on this? If not, I would like to submit these >for last calls to be published as Informational RFC's. > >We also need to decide if there is any need to meet at LA. I do not think >we have any additional work at this point. If anybody has work item that >they feel requires a meeting at LA please let me know. I will have to >request for a slot. If I do not hear from anybody, I will assume there is >no need to meet at LA. > >We need to push for interoperability at the next IPsec workshop and I guess >this is already happenning. >--Naganand > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Naganand Doraswamy (978)916-1323 (O) >Bay Architecture Lab (978)670-8153 (Fax) >3 Federal St, Mail Stop BL3-03 >Billerica, MA 01821 > >
- Next Step Naganand Doraswamy
- RE: Next Step Roy Pereira
- Re: Next Step Bob Monsour
- Re: Next Step Bob Monsour
- RE: Next Step Roy Pereira
- Re: Next Step Avram Shacham
- Re: Next Step Daniel Harkins
- Re: Next Step Naganand Doraswamy
- Re: Next Step Daniel Harkins
- Re: Next Step Steve Sneddon
- Re: Next Step Naganand Doraswamy
- Re: Next Step Daniel Harkins
- Re: Next Step Avram Shacham