[ippm] Question on the "advancement of metrics draft".
<Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de> Tue, 02 February 2010 08:47 UTC
Return-Path: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76D53A6AEC for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:47:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WcrcqMbkPuX7 for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:47:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [194.25.30.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE25B3A6AED for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:47:38 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYAAAd2Z0sKl7So/2dsb2JhbAAI10kChEME
Received: from s4de8psaans.blf.telekom.de (HELO s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de) ([10.151.180.168]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2010 09:48:10 +0100
Received: from S4DE8PSAAQA.mitte.t-com.de ([10.151.229.12]) by s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:47:58 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:47:57 +0100
Message-ID: <151C164FE2E066418D8D44D0801543A50316D3FC@S4DE8PSAAQA.mitte.t-com.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: Question on the "advancement of metrics draft".
thread-index: Acpxzjku8E+TKirzSFOGMsmor9cpogAjZ2ZQDCuqWDA=
References: <4B13DEA1.8070309@ripe.net>
From: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
To: henk@ripe.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2010 08:47:58.0634 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B95F0A0:01CAA3E4]
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Question on the "advancement of metrics draft".
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:47:40 -0000
Hello Henk, currently, the text of the metric advancement draft contains a new implementation requirement: "An IPPM compliant metric implementation whose measurement requires synchronized clocks is however expected to provide precise measurement results. Any IPPM metric implementation MUST be of a precision of 1 ms (+/- 500 us) with a confidence of 95% if the metric is captured along an Internet path which is stable and not congested during a measurement duration of an hour or more." Are we in a position to specify new implementation requirements in this document? If not, do we have to remove "requirement lanuage" and content entirely or can this content stay, if is softened up (either SHOULD or content without requirement language?). Regards, Ruediger Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH Zentrum Technik Einführung Rüdiger Geib Heinrich-Hertz-Straße 3-7, 64295 Darmstadt +49 6151 628-2747 (Tel.) +49 251 7985 209 (Fax) http://www.telekom.com Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Steffen Roehn (Vorsitzender) Geschäftsführung: Dr. Bruno Jacobfeuerborn (Vorsitzender), Albert Matheis, Klaus Peren Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 14190 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn USt-IdNr. DE 814645262 -----Original Message----- From: Geib, Rüdiger Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:58 AM To: 'Henk Uijterwaal' Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Editorial team to work on the "advancement of metrics draft".] Henk, thanks for your support. Regards, Rudiger -----Original Message----- From: Henk Uijterwaal [mailto:henk@ripe.net] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:03 PM To: Geib, Rüdiger Subject: [Fwd: Re: Editorial team to work on the "advancement of metrics draft".] FYI. H. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Editorial team to work on the "advancement of metrics draft". Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:32:56 -0500 (EST) From: sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) To: henk@ripe.net I did read through the 1st version and it looked fine - content wise I will say it seems a bit funny to be quoting an expired ID (bradner-metrictest) I'd suggest just take the text and put an acknowledgement in somewhere and drop the note that the ID is being quoted Scott -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public. H.L.Mencken
- [ippm] Question on the "advancement of metrics dr… Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [ippm] Question on the "advancement of metric… Henk Uijterwaal
- [ippm] Looking for the current email address of R… Ruediger.Geib