[ippm] IOAM hackathon results
Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net> Wed, 24 July 2019 14:44 UTC
Return-Path: <tom@quantonium.net>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F331120284 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quantonium-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qHr4ylS8y7P for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE41120288 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id s15so20523431wmj.3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quantonium-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/OHeFTyzZEA+zKAwIDqaQ09SIvONQobhnt6hP8JOeOk=; b=VoZkQ2ficCc6Xqu5AmLncuf6j1weVSOBT9BVLGUmTqffN39gjJIg8xz17gX1XfVESy CSRrugVIGAjlW8DlOZuqrbvTybk/o0Xj6/DPXVAuZefzkToXmzkna1grMvIOCIKp6GGy M2lh+WV69lPh+qyZdT2fcceBZ6v/aKyNjKUv+KzVSJsSoYz75D2IhDRF7MVnW4nQ6Frq 6IyXQnEHEPh6v75qzZZ644BKwfMITGmd9rIX9YmSEVgNl1e35JuU7Xl2oSuBV0wsAwkB 3+74mOgBm2f6bquNwBsv5yWFh4Avc75FFz9jchHKUO7nULpWYc/82H8YxshNLJcUtoIY 4nTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/OHeFTyzZEA+zKAwIDqaQ09SIvONQobhnt6hP8JOeOk=; b=jmo3wrkgIo8BPsM28nV6WEdnfVOAWIDTry5w5r/ncLAxGeUNENl2N9XtJCXYu8EpUh Xd3v5jDDtzJdxX/qTF7a8Tk08VngC21ESzhNTLR+ghej6HGWe/g0bcM7X1v7hSjHeKm0 NkgFKeqEeboXOgc1GIqkSQWq3hdFWjFOKiCl7kPYASEzIlu6XIlL9TJHymDwiejS8vfe 203FsvhXG74n4GVZ0OBXB75j+mVnnKAv/knTCrI0SpjVOeFw5jtB6QaFBPYkZqJCctRz 7R/WFHrH2a9sIlXcAYCBH9qNj2RBzH7fVBYZHxMH5StS1nXVzQARnVEgz1lfkRxbJifn /BQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvg6U285rAyVdIWs45WEeFxX5CuzQ3mi4YB22Ou5AvsxZpkxa7 PDWK+SVBVBAEQ9ohPX8mNCu1ZkYjk8LLitF0teSW0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyj6AWn9dgadJfoLqxWmK8TieGUx4HdaJYRkDXzvBcQH713CBsQwyav2Ju4s026U+8XT/M7UoJzT6ZGutbP7dM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2297:: with SMTP id 23mr22466391wmf.47.1563979483452; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:44:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDqMeqP1-nPCn7oETUHXw3a3QmMw3_YD3YFSnjyE8Uo_NZW4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000008c6caf058e6e5920"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/28ypVtSQsBCm5-uGhFH4TlpW6cQ>
Subject: [ippm] IOAM hackathon results
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:44:48 -0000
Hello, We held the IOAM HBH option hackathon on Saturday and Sunday. Had five active participants working on two different implemenations (one host and one router implementation). Please see attached slides that describe results. Overall, we made quite a bit of progress and will be sharing some implementation feedback on the protocol in ippm meeting. Looking forward, I that it would be good to have a follow on hackathon project in IETF105 or IETF106, and in particular to get more implemenations involved particularly on the router side. Thanks, Tom
- [ippm] IOAM hackathon results Tom Herbert