[ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-05.txt> (IPPM standard advancement testing) to BCP
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 01 December 2011 14:47 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35511E83ED; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:47:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VpWXzIjMhp+I; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB7A11E80A6; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64
Message-ID: <20111201144744.30975.72020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:47:44 -0800
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-05.txt> (IPPM standard advancement testing) to BCP
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:47:45 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm) to consider the following document: - 'IPPM standard advancement testing' <draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-05.txt> as a BCP The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-12-15. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This document includes a normative reference to RFC 2330, which is an Informational RFC, however, RFC 2330 has been used as a normative reference in several other IPPM working group documents, though some predate the requirement to split normative and informative references. One example of an existing normative reference to RFC 2330 is found in RFC 6049. The IESG is particularly interested in determining whether the community considers RFC 2330 sufficiently mature to serve as a normative reference for standards track and BCP publications. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.