Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5549)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 16:30 UTC

From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "CIAVATTONE, LEN" <lc9892@att.com>, "spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, "ietf@kuehlewind.net" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "ietf@wjcerveny.com" <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "ietf@trammell.ch" <ietf@trammell.ch>, "tpauly@apple.com" <tpauly@apple.com>
CC: "prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com" <prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5549)
Thread-Index: AQHUdlKcvG1ZSaDbskuriHI+UlJysaVHpNAA
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 16:29:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF557DDDB0@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <20181107043043.5854CB80EE3@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181107043043.5854CB80EE3@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/4G-L63x3jgyvZ8kTvUfQAasxztQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5549)
Precedence: list

It looks like this Errata should be verified.

A similar point was verified in RFC 5357 (last year):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5046

Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:31 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>; CIAVATTONE, LEN
> <lc9892@att.com>; spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com; ietf@kuehlewind.net;
> ietf@wjcerveny.com; ietf@trammell.ch; tpauly@apple.com
> Cc: prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com; ippm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5549)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6038,
> "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and
> Symmetrical Size Features".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5549
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Prabhjot Singh Sethi <prabhjot.sethi@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 5.1.5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In this combined mode, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the
> 27 MBZ octets.  In Authenticated or Encrypted modes, the Packet
> Padding to be reflected follows the 56 MBZ octets.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In this combined mode, the Packet Padding to be reflected follows the
> 27 MBZ octets.  In Authenticated or Encrypted modes, the Packet
> Padding to be reflected follows the 64 MBZ octets.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> to achieve symmetrical size in authenticated and encrypted mode length of
> mbz field needs to be 64 octects instead of 56 octects
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect
> Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
> Publication Date    : October 2010
> Author(s)           : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IP Performance Measurement
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (5… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)