[ippm] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-10: (with COMMENT)

[Andrew Alston via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Firstly thanks for the modifications to the text.  While I still support the
discuss points raised by John, I'm going to clear my discuss based on the fact
that I think that the new next in C2 seems to address my destination option
query, since I'm going to presume that if the destination address is a SID - it
stands to reason that where a SID is not bound to a specific interface, it
cannot be IOAM enabled and therefore the packets should be ignored.