[ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (6409)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 January 2021 01:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E2A3A1A6C; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4CyV5ZpJZQU; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7473A1A68; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3A84FF4070E; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:26 -0800 (PST)
To: nmalykh@ieee.org, acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210126010526.3A84FF4070E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:05:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/5lXBYZvADcPZoOvQo3zNf2u_k8w>
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (6409)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 01:05:30 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6409 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Date Reported: 2021-01-25 Verified by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: 4.2 Original Text ------------- The Padding Length SHOULD be >= 56 octets when specifying a test session using the Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes to allow for the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. The Padding Length SHALL be > the Length of padding to reflect when specifying a test session using the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode. In Unauthenticated TWAMP-Test mode, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 27 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. In Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 56 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. Corrected Text -------------- The Padding Length SHOULD be >= 64 octets when specifying a test session using the Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes to allow for the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. The Padding Length SHALL be > the Length of padding to reflect when specifying a test session using the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode. In Unauthenticated TWAMP-Test mode, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 27 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. In Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 64 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. Notes ----- Invalid required padding size (56 instead of 64) for modes with authentication and encryption. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (6409) RFC Errata System