[ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-marking-02.txt
Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> Fri, 30 June 2017 04:26 UTC
Return-Path: <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C590127599 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePqcN-L1XkRK for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01AD1274D2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b184so33422213wme.1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PHGza7245r8Tr66LRZoNu8U7ZM0/ow+ExzjWFL0TAQo=; b=eR47MpQnHBjSXLkgf5KdAuogbHK/ckXG5amL/laY7x9LGDvE8JxzDEPwow+H2BOshu 92UKAfG4DESebHqxf/Tif60k6h2cxT4dOJC1ydBIEcfbk45M6mquC+6Po/5qxS9tDEPR 7QiAaMWmzISHbOXcun3ox6+ht+U26O5dbPu17Y9EFk/8RlQFj85LeBi4MOgnwjT8r0/8 p1Hhl7HjynVOeBE2c6vJgRflNU8YG1ifF7K9+m9s3gLEV5xz8xMbtp9ltkRShxoW8qY4 PW+PCngel5W2hDQ4VOvRZ6/hzv35GAsRJk9+O+DCAGYuL67yebJ1l6cBwG/08zqlbYNA 9mYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PHGza7245r8Tr66LRZoNu8U7ZM0/ow+ExzjWFL0TAQo=; b=L5cmrxvP6eTrVsrjeDKLqkYyFaVdb1EBZhGMdiYUCSdng+DYMOm9Ji5RTVpmlegrue O2Z3xIahyxSR5KT4w/RtDwcfr1E+ttDBiQ69DCGIz8G1Mxfi2iPL4cWXbfC0BahdNNXW KLdhdpHWE7MOLhV5Eg6mdPeATYIR6uskbvbbEEBg14tv14/oMQBFSZAugsAfMlrOe7wx aZ8gVylsDzY5EgPBjLUWCDpuqsvGk5s8zzYj1OfwbEwTG96DsdyxWthlnQkEneoznMNf yocU21D8Mm9e5uUA1EwITf6Q4fnUMmTyWvH5CQSJ2vSez/MrYTArhow86GxrlHaEiEoo 2GBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx6aepcrfTzDk7Ms7WOcfvvacF24d3Z4uR05nTVa5VzGFaMJVBF oaraGZ77nou2ibVOr14d0xtjeo+mEA==
X-Received: by 10.80.165.164 with SMTP id a33mr3817004edc.53.1498796764373; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.170.19 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8652552cd3ef416fb4f4e1a088ead8cd@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
References: <8652552cd3ef416fb4f4e1a088ead8cd@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
From: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:26:04 +0300
Message-ID: <CABUE3Xn1JGqyKhR+g9+TvWnvK_2U0aRGi5_AWkkz-Od68PBbAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c2806bb2968055325d021"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/6DRy8F00oEVhlfWFXp_pciKdIXA>
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-marking-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:26:08 -0000
Hi, We have made a major revision of the draft. Its scope is now wider, and hopefully more useful to the reader - please see the abstract below for further details. Following this major revision, we would highly appreciate any comments, and especially any feedback regarding whether the draft is of interest to the WG. Thanks, Tal. -----Original Message----- From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:08 AM To: Giuseppe Fioccola; Tal Mizrahi; Gregory Mirsky; Carmi Arad; Mauro Cociglio; Greg Mirsky; Mach Chen; Mach Chen (Guoyi); Lianshu Zheng Subject: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking-02.txt External Email ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A new version of I-D, draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-marking- 02.txt has been successfully submitted by Tal Mizrahi and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-marking Revision: 02 Title: Compact Alternate Marking Methods for Passive Performance Monitoring Document date: 2017-06-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 21 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking-02 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mizrahi-ippm- multiplexed-alternate-marking-02 Abstract: This memo introduces new alternate marking methods that require a compact overhead of either a single bit per packet, or zero bits per packet. This memo also presents a summary of alternate marking methods, and discusses the tradeoffs among them. The target audience of this document is network protocol designers; this document is intended to help protocol designers choose the best alternate marking method(s) based on the protocol's constraints and requirements. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat