[ippm] Performance Metrics Registry: new draft
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD42B11E8171 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.305
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.294, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3eFy+uY3Kg3A for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956B411E8166 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6FGAn3q001255 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6FGAmTX029102 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <51E41F08.4060407@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:10:48 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ippm] Performance Metrics Registry: new draft
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:10:54 -0000
Dear all, Let me introduce http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-claise-ippm-perf-metric-registry/ This draft creates of a new IANA registry, for performance metrics that follows the RFC6390 template. And, let's not forget that the IPPM charter mentions: "Metric definitions will follow the template given in RFC 6390." Thanks Brian for giving me 10 min to present this draft. Regards, Benoit.
- [ippm] Performance Metrics Registry: new draft Benoit Claise
- Re: [ippm] Performance Metrics Registry: new draft philip.eardley