[ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07

Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 19 May 2022 15:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export.all@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <165297463378.5296.5590170778832486427@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 08:37:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/6njBYIxXYt8PKP2nMOAP_YzWC0o>
Subject: [ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07

Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
Review result: Has Issues

First, apologies for the dramatically late review. I hope this is still useful.

I think there are two issues worth considering:

1. The DEX scheme seems to create a potential for DoS based on storage whereas
I think prevously only DoS vectors related to traffic were documented in the
IAOM drafts. That's based on a quick scan though so I may have missed it being
considered.

2. I see no mention at all of privacy in this draft nor in
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data - I don't understand why that's ok given that privacy
leaks from the kind of metadata collected here can be subtle? Or maybe that's
in some other draft?

[ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioa… Stephen Farrell via Datatracker
Re: [ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm… Haoyu Song
Re: [ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm… Stephen Farrell
Re: [ippm] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-ippm… Tal Mizrahi