Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03.txt

"li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B693A245D for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2021 21:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.225
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8nB-tYW67E3 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2021 21:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823C93A2468 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2021 21:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PPooNCLqPeIVlpCIWnUar0to74dGn7z/WeBgx02U0vGTExuVjDmMtMs3yiw/Q9IbW/gn+CE/he3hIyPkyY8bVY45e4Pyz48Ee2vOiBRVnQ548nBeer4GOlLvcLnaY5cZ0bNiHfxe2ywt+XocqBZtG7jo0r5B5q/mF4MqQ1F9ZApZQJNYhyichag299qQNFTyZ1MKxbwBRYyiR751M8hPrWL8yejrbxKJzsrslrMATGAtbFHo9Lue/XZbmxXS0ss2qgX+VeNN6z3TCRul40qSUhLGg0L5VhgurSUYKOIgU0G7UtL1B3b7xvZ6IvKs1cTQTF6K1ZxbtLEQ/SooXkyPtg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=djJBt1MQlc5seAAlOrr7rhuYKAFJjBz6kWtz0tdFO20=; b=fsNDVYrswFoOHfZTGFS4HR8pyJp0frBrbgx/K5GXoY/38erbJbPt4VBkO0n9BfNWhGqhRp6OaZRSHaGcP0ddnH+Pl+Z0A0JRHqInBgsldPka989MkfBp+FmHD0UFoa4n7IFfbiiIvU+l2g7lR6Zt5T7p1cS5NzdsiNbiZ5DfXDJ8+xWiLHzlWmL2rUFJJ245HEn0lhLL5qGCgxA6NfQPM34AJaCZzwkRFxjJsaZ2yI3CVHsl8M9+EGKS5tLp1oS7WgOGO5d1pV+NLiqlVaq9HekzrcXXhIKrjgi1tfeuPimM4luhvNpiISQzp7yvC+dvavv7nT16YtxiVpFyj3OCzQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=djJBt1MQlc5seAAlOrr7rhuYKAFJjBz6kWtz0tdFO20=; b=TOLNZ6ecXg5rIm7hMfU2chMpgz4+3z1MDaIdMKDXBwGIhiYkiTxM2QDd0FwZp8kr8Dq5lzWsPKUB4JokzlNcLgog4MzgpGOIQK8yBLMTxP1EzM4nLGhnY4ZiMERZ7hB0+YTsptNg/GsMJQsT7XB24nLTvjgd16Gi27kdQYIbJPf/DQf391hAfNbIvG7Z4y7Cp5XZZvYLNGY5BR572XqrBJhnroN2FTj7NsbI5tqSfw+GqeOSqFjJ84Pz7nlAflzMwqytOCVuY7fCi0DvMVCQv7fntwu/DAUp6R5jF8Ecw/8qp0dHySYSVmbArRK17idOveXSNXzFz1XxRPvdTxO6FA==
Received: from SL2P216CA0107.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:101:3::22) by HK0PR01MB2260.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:1096:203:7e::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4129.26; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:17:23 +0000
Received: from PU1APC01FT046.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:1096:101:3:cafe::9a) by SL2P216CA0107.outlook.office365.com (2603:1096:101:3::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.30 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:17:23 +0000
Received: from MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.252.60) by PU1APC01FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.253.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4129.25 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:17:22 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:C522ACBEED00A14A2D56A052BF771F63EABA5AF392E62C5FF800E2BDEA0C54A4; UpperCasedChecksum:DDFA2FA45624CE6FEB7D0B38FB724CE27FB3E691167182ABD507C1ABD514A8DC; SizeAsReceived:8677; Count:45
Received: from MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1509:afbc:fb4c:27cd]) by MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::1509:afbc:fb4c:27cd%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4129.026; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:17:22 +0000
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:18:36 +0800
From: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: "Tommy Pauly" <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ippm <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <161973737124.22024.361534673966887143@ietfa.amsl.com>, <CAMZsk6ck5iHjbzkQ4cHyH9yDfFbnwGhG4xUnd95QmVyGRCgiTA@mail.gmail.com>, <5A8BB0C9-DD8F-405F-93F4-39F485970DF0@apple.com>
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
Message-ID: <MEYP282MB2942D763B9B70E11721A4083FC519@MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart648474320574_=----"
X-TMN: [FBTbq1MWxfVsGv0aZNjNbRA1Su464J2f]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HKAPR03CA0031.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:c9::18) To MEYP282MB2942.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:220:157::9)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2021051312183172072135@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from cmcc-PC (183.243.241.245) by HKAPR03CA0031.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:c9::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.4150.11 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:17:21 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 45
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 2b4c510a-9cb9-460e-8e8b-08d915c60173
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK0PR01MB2260:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: CvNWTSIyvtbAkmPZzfwyOhZYXJeVhYa50Dz4DaYmVCt/uyU9xvT7FlDqvjfKWVlQxldkHMm2bD4n9e2RFVIARx8oNa3KudHAy2IhXKTrCgG1t4TeV2Rvry7jhEQZps9OBqQGPfB+CpARIKbP6tOnOElKA9CBHTZVJvYS3kl29O41TB01/3Y/iowyTDXk+Bjb3ZdCaibbZzplcEfrn7W8afNEHQhnqjM2URvXK8hKPoftaI2LgL5ZLfya8t0SNJsAb3mRk+S920jUGiGhmUaIDd3qBAXwDVAG2waq3QtnWlPQqsnHlt0MhtMvTpbGTBjLGVa+hxEoFmr0UxUV3+3jzFcskULPl9G1BVZ1ND4/nZ0S64r5H6ka1pX2G3irZwW6N45An2w6HYUyqTl9jCghu5xmTN8K4/O55exXU7twJa/Xzwg8KSejvAJ7oC/C2gZg6EV3S8NUllnr6PcAWDTzJw==
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: KYkVKGLQ84uiEB7OUkU2xOOQMZEXfL0lR2WkeSpsmAcF6e/CHIlbYacywC3RHysz82s8laf2ESJ3dK2OhwRi/vnhNIIB8RNTdrWnVLHzv0O0eskga90FgP3BjsSdpzWDxHPGuGjgTXj8l6jaYJBNRg==
X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-20-msonline-outlook-5c337.templateTenant
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2b4c510a-9cb9-460e-8e8b-08d915c60173
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2021 04:17:22.7588 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PU1APC01FT046.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK0PR01MB2260
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8ebtVdserhBZ_3Ip4WIXgvpxDac>
Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 04:18:09 -0000

Hello Tommy and All,

I believe this work is useful, especially the way to direct the session-reflector to reflect the test packets along a specific path, which can be the reverse path from session-sender to session-reflector, or an explicit path specified in segment list sub TLV.

I wonder there are security problems redarding the return address sub tlv since this feature can be used to direct the test packets to a malicious node indicated by the return address. This feature may also be used to direct a group of session-reflectors to send their test packets to a target node indicated by the return address to enforce DDOS attack to the target. Security Considerations should take these into account.

BTW, is this an adoption call for this draft?

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li


li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
 
From: Tommy Pauly
Date: 2021-05-08 04:42
To: IETF IPPM WG
Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03.txt
Hi IPPM,

This draft has been discussed and debated at length before, and the chairs would like to get input from the WG on their thoughts on this version of the document and its direction. Given the interaction with other working groups, we’d like to make progress on this in a timely fashion.

Please do send your thoughts and feedback to the list, particularly if you support this work, or if you have concerns new or existing.

Best,
Tommy

On May 3, 2021, at 9:42 AM, Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi WG,
This revision contains following updates:
Welcome Richard as a co-author
Merge Segment List Sub-TLVs
Various editorial changes

Welcome your review comments and suggestions.

Thanks,
Rakesh (for co-authors)


On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:03 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Simple TWAMP (STAMP) Extensions for Segment Routing Networks
        Authors         : Rakesh Gandhi
                          Clarence Filsfils
                          Daniel Voyer
                          Mach(Guoyi) Chen
                          Bart Janssens
                          Richard Foote
        Filename        : draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03.txt
        Pages           : 12
        Date            : 2021-04-29

Abstract:
   Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm.  SR is
   applicable to both Multiprotocol Label Switching (SR-MPLS) and IPv6
   (SRv6) data planes.  This document specifies RFC 8762 (Simple Two-Way
   Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)) extensions for SR networks, for
   both SR-MPLS and SRv6 data planes by augmenting the optional
   extensions defined in RFC 8972.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm