[ippm] [Errata Rejected] RFC8913 (6751)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 21 March 2024 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417EFC151088; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eU4QkZrcCHZS; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71698C14F693; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 49D3BBAC7C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: nmalykh@ieee.org, ruthcivil@gmail.com, acmorton@att.com, reshad@yahoo.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, kostas.pentikousis@detecon.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240321175426.49D3BBAC7C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:54:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8gSI_JUUtvmzOtSV6BzSLA7od00>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:56:09 -0700
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Rejected] RFC8913 (6751)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:54:30 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8913,
"Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) YANG Data Model".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6751

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>
Date Reported: 2021-11-23
Rejected by: RFC Editor  

Section: 5.1

Original Text
-------------
   Please note that the backslash ('\') character near the end of the
   diagram is used for formatting purposes only (i.e.,
   "reflector-udp-port]" should be treated as part of the same line as
   "[sender-ip sender-udp-port reflector-ip").

Corrected Text
--------------
   Please note that the backslash ('\') character near the end of the
   diagram is used for formatting purposes only (i.e.,
   "reflector-udp-port]" should be treated as part of the same line as
   "[sender-ip sender-udp-port reflector-ip]").

Notes
-----
Omitted character ']' at the end of a sentence.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
The original is correct. It explains how the following entry was broken across two lines due to line-length constraints:

           +--ro test-session*
                   [sender-ip sender-udp-port reflector-ip \
                    reflector-udp-port]  

--------------------------------------
RFC8913 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) YANG Data Model
Publication Date    : November 2021
Author(s)           : R. Civil, A. Morton, R. Rahman, M. Jethanandani, K. Pentikousis, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Performance Measurement
Stream              : IETF