Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07.txt
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5863A0C07; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzw80D24Sz6Y; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BB93A0C80; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id q3so2400884ilt.8; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0nUmtsJ6CouM64JHCORxKGpNJX2JNr0SCKCoFIIU9NY=; b=u40l16Cz9795WRd7YzzjKy/7fgPhEK2QVEp2699FTHx4wQpVlATb+tNebufLMyB4I1 0tDxpWEFe+76biULZy5lTtEFhDMDDV8y0828mVQt0UDgA60368vnYbkqtjPi260M+agb xkn/t4iMDLIn2u2EXE1rxXnQRMsmYu4nHPb5VY4X+KuHO0XcQJtDcrM7D0dCnfRfwucD XZX9yMgjVbM4rsphp157uXxVSsA54k9gMlFJtbdECfxiuFmOtC9ydp1d5nX8A5IrBMEo 2Xl2qhv1sUs2pc6q3XgUpArq5zNIihAHjvjYb/XwVc92M6FJ/cPJLVMi1wuFgt7CliqG fP5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0nUmtsJ6CouM64JHCORxKGpNJX2JNr0SCKCoFIIU9NY=; b=Iknld9hoyXh3COTJH1m/sWlKZ98mtzZ95N4glLdPI1SevNIMz/8rm9CQSwFOFP6Nd3 jkQCNOe4TmBdCV5f/G2DS56GPSTqsg8hfKeky1ntgFuyNxzJhPMknig8VwvC5+yu8jxt OIkysMt7mFK4pFNr/bU/Y6rcnC5eSLDD/yqHuQxyWAhzCm7t91SVehCVooBB8X7sPb4F gqdfV9vvKON9dSdQ0YHO2E2jVvbhGmClVsu67Qdg6yddMZShmIhAAABCJunpPye07gcU IQGhc5cpcDPDB0bHTAXGFNVhkCtbb+Nqqy7oIqKrkqTnJksKvoCfcfALRJy1LmJ7pM3i 2NPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gAI7aezTC28GNCYiI4lHiC+Pnp34FphAACghEOCXHo2XwC/Zr zYWoxHmYOCrw7/Mru+3jdmJ7opvCz6YNer4s+XM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUUEm7bd9haCdSwjyLOsIdoOouuuCqM3BwV79joSwpNTge+PcJGDWGvQjdlapc8fYbWiWgtKVCIBfkVZPZidc=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d6d2:: with SMTP id z18mr45674476ilp.272.1594309448057; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159426002734.30582.13939934711917252270@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmU4mcfVy5Ouhs=MGYTu=2yH9cqFkesKYowy2ousyq6foA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxRvy=ud3OR8SmwXpPwYbgYV24HNjDtV8yqgYKHyTnNeFA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmU6O=VK9eqet84kAmugeOa7t8+8X73CebU7wAytPcy-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmU6O=VK9eqet84kAmugeOa7t8+8X73CebU7wAytPcy-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:43:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTJJe6pqiSxgL_oxb+2pHDKHP-ev9j4_ygieoAVxjUMYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, Charlie Kaufman <charliekaufman@outlook.com>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000504a6205aa041853"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/9wkR1KSIMDYzBh57VlOaJaWTew8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:44:20 -0000
Never mind, since you just have FCFS and IETF Review, you don't need one. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:33 AM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Martin, > I hope that Al Morton, Rakesh Ghandi, and Xiao Min would agree to be > listed. Also, I'd volunteer to be on that list. > > Regards, > Greg > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:28 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Who should be the designated experts for the IANA registry? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:21 AM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> the new version includes updates that address comments by Rakesh Gandhi, >>> Martin Duke, Charlie Kaufman (SecDir), and Dan Romaskanu (GenART). Many >>> thanks to all reviewers for your comments and constructive discussions. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Greg >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >>> Date: Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:01 PM >>> Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07.txt >>> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> >>> Cc: <ippm@ietf.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the >>> IETF. >>> >>> Title : Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol >>> Optional Extensions >>> Authors : Greg Mirsky >>> Xiao Min >>> Henrik Nydell >>> Richard Foote >>> Adi Masputra >>> Ernesto Ruffini >>> Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07.txt >>> Pages : 28 >>> Date : 2020-07-08 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document describes optional extensions to Simple Two-way Active >>> Measurement Protocol (STAMP) that enable measurement of performance >>> metrics, in addition to ones supported by the STAMP base >>> specification. The document also defines a STAMP Test Session >>> Identifier and thus updates RFC 8762. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-07 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>> submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ippm mailing list >>> ippm@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm >>> >>
- [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-t… internet-drafts
- [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-opt… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-opti… Martin Duke
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-opti… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-opti… Martin Duke