[ippm] new version of RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Thu, 09 December 2021 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBB33A079F for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1gFMAXaGSju for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363773A079D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:16:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J92Dv2Ps3z67NyB; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 02:12:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:16:30 +0100
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:16:30 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
CC: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: new version of RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
Thread-Index: AdftJ2BrmRQFG3drRvW9xawZLVZBlw==
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 18:16:30 +0000
Message-ID: <32d0d908a32142e594d323ae12be146b@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.212.160]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_32d0d908a32142e594d323ae12be146bhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/D1ME2FLehY0edYWnyN91riR4x3c>
Subject: [ippm] new version of RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 18:16:39 -0000
Hi Martin, All, Please note that I just submitted a new revision of both RFC8321bis (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fioccola-rfc8321bis-01.txt) and RFC8889bis (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fioccola-rfc8889bis-01.txt). I tried to address the issues raised by Martin. Feedback will be welcome. Regards, Giuseppe
- [ippm] new version of RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis Giuseppe Fioccola