Re: [ippm] [IAB] Protocol Action: 'More Features for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol - TWAMP' to Proposed Standard
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 23 June 2009 08:30 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1013A6B1F; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jo2ZWCKDndJc; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8833A68ED; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.198] (wlan.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5N8UjMc074848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:30:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <F2E5EC0B-B61B-44E0-A2EC-2FA98C47B019@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, ippm chair <ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, ippm mailing list <ippm@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "iesg-secretary@ietf.org System" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090622180715.9C03728C25F@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-14--996815483"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:30:40 +0300
References: <20090622180715.9C03728C25F@core3.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.194]); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:30:48 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: Re: [ippm] [IAB] Protocol Action: 'More Features for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol - TWAMP' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:30:38 -0000
Hi, please note that the title of the document has been changed to "Mixed Security Mode for TWAMP" as indicated by the RFC Editor Note below - the document title in this email subject and body is hence incorrect. Lars On 2009-6-22, at 21:07, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has approved the following document: > > - 'More Features for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol - TWAMP ' > <draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-02.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > This document is the product of the IP Performance Metrics Working > Group. > > The IESG contact persons are Lars Eggert and Magnus Westerlund. > > A URL of this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-02.txt > > Technical Summary > > The IETF has completed its work on TWAMP - the Two-Way Active > Measurement Protocol. This memo describes a simple extension to > TWAMP, the option to use different security modes in the TWAMP- > Control and TWAMP-Test protocols. > > Working Group Summary > > This document was discussed at various IETF meetings in 2008. There > was no controversy in the WG process. Consensus was smooth. > > Document Quality > > At least 3 vendors are implementing TWAMP. > > Personnel > > The document shepherd is Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net). > Lars Eggert (lars.eggert@nokia.com) reviewed the ID for the IESG. > > RFC Editor Note > > RFC Editor's Note: > > Title: > OLD > More features for TWAMP > NEW > Mixed Security Mode for TWAMP > > > 5. Security Considerations > OLD > The extended mixed-mode of operation permits stronger security/ > integrity protection on the TWAMP-Control protocol while > simultaneously emphasizing accuracy or efficiency on the TWAMP-Test > protocol, thus making it possible to increase overall security when > compared to the previous options. > > NEW > The extended mixed-mode of operation permits stronger security/ > integrity protection on the TWAMP-Control protocol while > simultaneously emphasizing accuracy or efficiency on the TWAMP-Test > protocol, thus making it possible to increase overall security when > compared to the previous options (when resource constraints would > have forced less security for TWAMP-Control and unauthenticated > TWAMP-Test is not a significant concern). >