Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 21 August 2015 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38FC1A923D; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZ87dVba5wzh; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC921A923B; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkfi73 with SMTP id i73so31735799vkf.2; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yV6/7zGACJolgKm0DzeH6W640DWslALNWi2OZm3F8z0=; b=bWi4QDc1YsgC5c/CLMb/vZrl8Ki6oZUT/jqo3cXuZ79Swk8Ix6Bw/NzaGhLY2pOG4L DV9ghFDX/UxdPt1RwIaKae9C5fg7+zzZO1U5/qs1nPS8vhbX8qltPzLOiPXVa1zJGZuM O7KWJwhb90m7XRUguegCzCiOAaTVxwd6B/hFMHMFsfZa3NHmvXQg72L8KgBfphLiJxtb TRf9eeQKFwqsjysRyHBZo1195unL2ldOCDkiIgHAsdI/Nc0rE4/OAkJV6rSZ7FKWinrG X5p6/wJyavgF0OuaAq8GOo4V/479eG33r8cF2+NGEGEvc03d2oxdYXmCv1h/z7U8cXQ5 +FGQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.163.50 with SMTP id yf18mr10502012vdb.93.1440167359039; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.63.1 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A003DE00@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <20150818191431.10251.89743.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A003DCBE@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <5755582B-F64A-4FF9-BFBB-2329CD6F029E@cooperw.in> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A003DE00@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:29:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fQ7pAXkz2WHXjw7Ok4q4VhciAxoRpnZfyOtKsDiXQcYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2ce38da6ff5051dd317c1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/JjaWYyW2h9Ivscb-_N9duiVnunw>
Cc: "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, Bill Cerveny <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:29:21 -0000
Hi, Alissa, On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:53 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:55 PM > ... > > > > Ok, got it. I'm not sure anything actually needs to be noted here beyond > > what is already written in RFC 7312. It seems like you would want > > implementations to randomize the padding since measurement packets may > > or may not get encrypted at the transport layer. So I would suggest > > deleting the sentence from 3.6. > > > > > [ACM] > That works for me, will also delete the corresponding change note > in section 1. > Al has submitted a -05 that should address your Discuss. Could you take a peek at it, and let us know? Thank you, Spencer
- [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF