Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-14: (with DISCUSS)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 05 December 2019 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273D4120013; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:09:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oOlmPjozL0Ic; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729CA120019; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xB5F9TPF029276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:09:31 -0500
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 07:09:29 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@trammell.ch, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191205150929.GE13890@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <157555705167.16500.17382946462715568367.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <68BD61C9-ED5F-491D-9A9E-8049AE85BCDE@kuehlewind.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <68BD61C9-ED5F-491D-9A9E-8049AE85BCDE@kuehlewind.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/KJxOwU3A56ue1qfH0-3vd0FbHHg>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-14: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:09:36 -0000
Excellent; thank you! -Ben On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:08:38PM +0100, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Sorry, I missed that this was not updated. I did confirm with the shepherd that this as all been resolved and confirmed. Will make sure the write-up gets updated for the record accordingly. > > Mirja > > > > > On 5. Dec 2019, at 15:44, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-14: Discuss > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The shepherd writeup (which has a note that it is still in progress and > > not ready for submission) indicates that the "IPR questions are pending". > > Please confirm that they were affirmatively resolved. > > > > > > > > > > >
- [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipp… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [ippm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk