[ippm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17.txt

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 15 October 2026 13:38 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <179200737973.457646.16467693220565788855@dt-datatracker-66f49ddcbd-pbt9f>
In-Reply-To: <179200737973.457646.16467693220565788855@dt-datatracker-66f49ddcbd-pbt9f>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:38:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6dBzpKSzxDB8w4EEoxvJFBuOJF592xKaS5Ja5HzS29F8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b110fb065de12a3c"
Message-ID-Hash: KGVOZYTL77WWALGKXGC3UWDQMXY2PXIU
CC: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17.txt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/MKX7oyjgb-IQrt5pNPGIiObHTIc>

Dear WG,

This revision addresses comments received from Marc Blanchet for the ArtArt
review, Wesley Eddy for the TSVART review, and Shwetha Bhandari for the
Intdir review.

The changes are mostly related to clarification and editorial as follows:

   - Move some text from Procedure to Packet Format as Packet format
   section was moved ahead of the procedure section (AD review)
   - Rename Reflected IPv6 Extension Header Data to Received IPv6 Extension
   Header Data to avoid having the same name for the field and TLV causing
   ambiguity
   - Clarified the length field definition that it includes both fields
   (requested and received)
   - Added case for multiple headers matching the requested field
   - Added some text on how to get path MTU and updated handling for
   multiple TLVs as well as rule for remove it (from bottom) for MTU exceeded
   case
   - Added details for detecting corrupted packet
   - Fix nits
   - Various editorial changes for grammar and spelling


Welcome your comments and suggestions.

Thanks,
Rakesh (for authors)




On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 3:49 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17.txt is now available. It
> is a
> work item of the IP Performance Measurement (IPPM) WG of the IETF.
>
>    Title:   Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Extensions
> for Reflecting STAMP Packet IP Headers
>    Authors: Rakesh Gandhi
>             Tianran Zhou
>             Zhenqiang Li
>             William Hawkins
>    Name:    draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17.txt
>    Pages:   31
>    Dates:   2026-10-14
>
> Abstract:
>
>    The Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) and its
>    optional extensions can be used for Edge-to-Edge (E2E) active
>    measurements.  In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
>    (IOAM) data fields can be used for recording and collecting Hop-by-
>    Hop (HBH) and E2E operational and telemetry information.  This
>    document extends STAMP to reflect IPv4/IPv6 headers as well as IPv6
>    extension headers for HBH and E2E active measurements, for example,
>    using the IOAM data fields.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr/
>
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-17
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list -- ippm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ippm-leave@ietf.org
>

[ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-… internet-drafts
[ippm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-… Rakesh Gandhi