Re: [ippm] Updates to twamp light/stamp messages

Hi Xiao,
Thanks for your comments.
For STAMP messages, do you have any thoughts on the options 1-4?

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:14 PM <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
>
>
> I'm a bit confused why separate TWAMP-Light and STAMP messages need to be
> defined, because as  I understand STAMP can be seen as the standardized and
> enhanced version of TWAMP-Light, and STAMP is backward compatible with the
> existing TWAMP-Light implementations.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Xiao Min
> 原始邮件
> *发件人：*RakeshGandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
> *收件人：*IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>;
> draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org <
> draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org>;Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com
> >;
> *抄送人：*IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>;
> *日 期 ：*2020年03月12日 06:36
> *主 题 ：**[ippm] Updates to twamp light/stamp messages*
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> Hi WG,
>
> I have prepared few slides as follows to discuss the various options for
> adding session id and control code in the twamp light and stamp messages.
>
>
> https://github.com/rakgandhi/ietf-public/blob/master/ietf-stamp-session-id-rev1.pdf
>
>
> Drafts discussed are:
>
> draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm
>
> draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
>
>
> Welcome your comments and suggestions.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rakesh
>
>
>
>