[ippm] Fwd: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 16 April 2012 07:41 UTC
Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C5721F8734 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ccy9mXhex8Pq for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA09B21F8733 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3G7f48q023240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:41:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F8BCD0F.9050404@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:41:03 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <4F8BC453.4080709@uijterwaal.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4F8BC453.4080709@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4F8BC453.4080709@uijterwaal.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:41:37 -0000
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:03:47 +0200 From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> To: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> IPPM group, On 29/03/2012 11:36, Henk Uijterwaal wrote: > IPPM Group, > > This starts a WGLC for the draft: > > Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2679 on the Standards Track > draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01 > > Please review the draft and raise any issues by Monday, April 16, 2012, > 8:00 UTC. No issues were raised, so this document is approved and will be moved forward. Henk -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl http://www.uijterwaal.nl Phone: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day. (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
- [ippm] Fwd: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-testplan… Henk Uijterwaal