Re: [ippm] draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-00

Nieminen Klaus <Klaus.Nieminen@ficora.fi> Mon, 27 March 2017 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Nieminen@ficora.fi>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CE9129501 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 05:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lY6WJjxx9MaJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 05:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ironport2.ficora.fi (mail2.ficora.fi [IPv6:2a00:13f0:0:1002:125:160:0:165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3A8127449 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 05:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,231,1486418400"; d="scan'208";a="4307306"
Received: from ex16mbx2.laru.local (10.120.3.152) by ex16mbx1.laru.local (10.120.3.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id 15.1.669.32; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:26:14 +0300
Received: from LOOTA.laru.local (10.101.0.10) by ex16mbx2.laru.local (10.120.3.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.669.32 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:26:14 +0300
Received: from LOOTA.laru.local ([::1]) by loota.laru.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:26:14 +0300
From: Nieminen Klaus <Klaus.Nieminen@ficora.fi>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-00
Thread-Index: AdKm9H38SzXpyW6XQvalR4AjheJVXg==
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:26:14 +0000
Message-ID: <6AF4522BD5AB86429CFD3948A9AB2F2F44B15623@loota.laru.local>
Accept-Language: en-US, fi-FI
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.41.200.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/QLhxOi48z7wS2MUgXPI3PXQg4C0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-00
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:26:21 -0000

Hi,

Thanks Nalini for this proposal. 

One of the main challenges for measurements is that regulators are mainly targeting for crowdsourcing tools. 

How do you get this information e.g. to a browser or mobile app based measurement client and I did not yet understand how consumers would be able to captured and analyzed this information via analysis  tools as presented in Section 2.4.

See you in IPPM meeting soon.

Best,

Klaus

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:13:19 +0000 (UTC)
From: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: IPPM IETF <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-00
Message-ID: <2011967308.571957.1489936399775@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

IPPM,

Draft-nieminen-ippm-nn-measurements-00 "Net Neutrality Measurements: Regulatory Use Case and Problem Statement" outlines the requirements and use case for measuring Net Neutrality.

We have attached a draft showing how using PDM (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/) can be used to monitor Net Neutrality and how it meets the requirements outlined in the draft above.   

Since we are in the blackout period for draft submission, I am attaching the draft to this email.   We will submit it officially once the submission process opens again.

We look forward to an informal, offline discussion of this draft in Chicago with any interested parties.

Thanks,

Nalini Elkins
CEO and Founder
Inside Products, Inc.
www.insidethestack.com
(831) 659-8360