IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Thu, 20 August 2015 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC971A0127; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdmUIlH-_NcM; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225591A89F2; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98727122DAB; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:10:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.240.40]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49030F0484; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90%25]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:46:13 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:46:11 -0400
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AdDa0SSKm4mL/aK8Sy2NLN7KE1rChQAHO5DWABPZwVA=
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A003DDFE@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <20150819183410.31333.40680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A00FBB97@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <CAHbuEH5sU-B_csvgtwfNbZpzpMMaD5=6KKffah0EOnqpXTd85g@mail.gmail.com>, <CAHbuEH7focnXkcvbHpdWR+WprB69iFpo+-ETQ5r-gAe4QCAQcg@mail.gmail.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A00FBB99@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D09A00FBB99@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/U-Z5b4lmGrtSz0tjgpg4JTs70oc>
Cc: Bill Cerveny <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:46:19 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
...
> Since I have trouble distinguishing characterization from recon, I'm not
> clear how to qualify recon and what to write to address your concern.
> 
> We need a good idea here,
> Al
> 
> PS: I note that the Gen-ART review has caused us to write a new draft to
> address comments more fully and appropriately. Perhaps examination of
> recon providing obejctive differentiation from legit. net.
> characterization, and what recommendations are possible (beyond "don't
> engage in recon for evil purposes") could be studied more
> fully in the timeframe of this new draft.   ???
> 
And this is the URL for the draft (didn't have it while flying):
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-ippm-2330-stdform-typep-00

I should have mentioned that this draft intends to update the IPPM 
framework RFC, so it would be applicable to all active tests.

Al

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email