[ippm] publication request for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-03.txt
Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Thu, 18 February 2010 08:57 UTC
Return-Path: <henk@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90093A7E72; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:57:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.688, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pvjj4-YpDzVT; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1341]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568BF3A7E7F; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ayeaye.ripe.net ([193.0.1.103]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1Ni2EM-00061T-Ar; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:59:35 +0100
Received: from [193.0.21.124] (helo=guest-17.ripe.net) by ayeaye.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1Ni2EM-00089O-82; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:59:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7D0172.5090204@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:59:30 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, Matthew J Zekauskas <matt@internet2.edu>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d512f0ef141f9b57f9d51f6379ec334df5
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ----
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d512f0ef141f9b57f9d51f6379ec334df5
Subject: [ippm] publication request for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:57:57 -0000
Lars, IESG-secretary, The IPPM WG requests publication of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-03.txt on the standards track. The sheperd write-up for the document is below. Henk - - - - (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in particular, does he or she believe this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication? Document sheperd is Henk Uijterwaal. He would not have bothered to write this note if he didn't believe that the document was ready for publication. (1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members and from key non-WG members? This is a small feature request. About half a dozen people have read the document and confirmed that this request will work without affecting current implementations. The request itself seems to be a useful enhancement. (1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular or broader perspective, No. (1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? No, there are no such concerns. (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? Decent, with some 6 members of the group reviewing it. (1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? No. (1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the document satisfies all ID nits? All except a complaint about the boilerplate. This can be fixed by the editor easily. (1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and informative? Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? Yes, draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets. This draft has an ETA of Q1/2010. (1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document IANA consideration section exists and is consistent with the body of the document? Yes, it exists and appears to be complete and consistent (1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the document that are written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in an automated checker? N/A. (1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up? Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary The IETF has completed its work on the core specification of TWAMP - the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol. This memo describes a new feature for TWAMP, that gives the controlling host the ability to start and stop one or more individual test sessions using Session Identifiers. The base capability of the TWAMP protocol requires all test sessions previously requested and accepted to start and stop at the same time. Working Group Summary The normal WG process was followed and the document has been discussed for several years. The document as it is now, reflects WG consensus, with nothing special worth noticing. Document Quality Good -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public. H.L.Mencken
- [ippm] publication request for draft-ietf-ippm-tw… Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [ippm] publication request for draft-ietf-ipp… Al Morton